JackMagist said:
While I don't think much of Parcells' ability to judge QB talent (TEs and LBs ok...but not QBs) I do feel that we have had some assistant coaches here who DO know QBs. Sean Payton and David Lee are both considered very good QB coaches and they have had a good look at both Romo and Henson. I think that if either of these guys (Romo and Henson) were as poor as you suggest that they would have been weeded out and sent packing.
At this point Romo seems to be ahead of Henson as he was the #2 all last year and through this recent mini-camp. And based on the fact that we have had Romo here for 3 years with some very good QB coaches looking at him and he is still the #2 guy tells me that he has the potential to play NFL QB at a high level. But I have yet to see anything that convinces me that Henson is out of the picture either.
Or...
It could be that our GM has said that Henson stays for X years almost regardless of his play. We did spend a 3rd and knew it could take some time to develop him amidst knocking off rust from baseball. Its very conceivable that Henson is staying despite recommendations from Lee &/or Payton to the contrary. Just speculating.
And Romo might be here because he truly has shown too much to cut him in favor of some older vet who may be a better b/u today but is too old to have a future with the team. Maybe there ARE better #2 QB options on the market but Parcells believes so much in Romos future potential that he is willing to risk some present danger for future payoff. And if Henson is truly untouchable at this point...
I think its entirely possible that Bill would prefer a vet b/u with Romo as #3 but Jerry has said that Henson stays. That leaves Bill with a dilemma he currently satisfies by staying with Romo.
I also think that Parcells wouldn't publicly ga-ga over Romo in deference to Henson and Jerry. Parcells typically holds his cards pretty close anyway.
I'm not convinced that Henson is out of the picture. But I am starting to think that the ice below him is growing thin. What is Bill's/Landry's year 3 rule? This is Henson's 3rd year.
Now even if Henson's year 3 TC is spotty the front office may want to keep him for yet another year. What could change that? If the Ivy League UDFA shows real promise they could still try to slip him through to the PS.
Its really difficult to discern the status of Romo & Henson but if you MADE me guess I would probably say that the coaches do indeed like what they have in Romo more than Henson at this point and after 2 full seasons and another Tcamp coming up it wouldn't shock me to see Henson moved out.
I'm not pro one or the other. I just want us developing a good QB for when Bledsoe is done.