Pay Prescott!

[OmerV]

OK, he had at least one other pass that was behind the receiver as well. Another crossing route I believe.

I was only talking about the decisions and not the accuracy. But really I think even the accuracy was better in this game. In many of the games this year he had a number of throws (4-5?) that were a little behind the receiver, but that didn't seem to be an issue in this one. Not that he didn't have a throw or two that weren't off target, but there are always some of those with every QB.

 

[America's Cowboy]

But you appear more interested in being right about Dak than what’s in the Cowboys best interest which Id argue over paying Dak isn’t.

Like I said most of us want to sign Dak. It’s the price and what that means which is the bigger discussion.

You being right about Dak ultimately means championships. Still to be determined.

Nope. I would rather Dak take $28 million, but we all know there is no way he is going to accept that. He's already said no to $30 million.

 

[America's Cowboy]

I need that ring.

Here you go Glim!

 

[ActualCowboysFan]

I had no problem at all, took me like two minutes, an there are other articles that report the same thing. Now, if you have an issue with that article, then prove it wrong. That's on you, not me. I've posted a source for what you asked for. The problem here is you, it's not the info.

No the problem is only three QBs meet your ignorant standard you vaguely heard about and didn't understand but parrot because it supports your dumb narrative. Now to make sure you understand how stupid your point is please regale me with your solution for the 29 teams without Russell Wilson, Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger.

 

[Corso]

Hey Corso, how you doing? Thanks for answering this. I think it's interesting that Rodgers doesn't have a winning record and he's actually a really good example, IMO. If I'm not mistaken, Rodgers got the new contract in 2013? He then got another in 2018? It would be interesting to look at what his record was prior to and compare it to what he has done since. He's actually a perfect example of why I think you shouldn't make Dak the highest paid QB in the NFL. As talented as Rodgers is, and he is about as talented as they come, he can't win without a team around him and his contract is the driver in why Green Bay has not won since 2010 and actually significantly declined in the last few years.

I agree with you.
Those nights in ABQ were coooooold!
But it was fruitful and we had a good time.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

OK, no problem.

Here is an article discussing it. Dak is 10-14 against winning teams.

https://www.thebiglead.com/posts/da...nning-teams-is-cause-for-concern-01dpk8xfkex5

Now, it's your turn. Show me the QB who got a record deal with a losing record against winning teams, one sad person to another.

Oh big YIKES this will backfire big time.

The list of QBs with winning records against winning teams is- Brady, Big Ben, and Wilson. That's it. That's the list. Dak is actually one of the QBs closest to .500

So Derek Carr, Jimmy G, Ryan, Kirk Cousins, Luck, Stafford, Flacco, Wilson, etc, etc, etc all signed record deals.

 

[Sevenup3000]

No the problem is only three QBs meet your ignorant standard you vaguely heard about and didn't understand but parrot because it supports your dumb narrative. Now to make sure you understand how stupid your point is please regale me with your solution for the 29 teams without Russell Wilson, Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger.

Exactly. I was completely floored at his dumb-*** standard. Really? Name a QB that got a record deal with a losing record vs. winning team? Completely ignorance...

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

No the problem is only three QBs meet your ignorant standard you vaguely heard about and didn't understand but parrot because it supports your dumb narrative. Now to make sure you understand how stupid your point is please regale me with your solution for the 29 teams without Russell Wilson, Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger.

Dang, didn't realize you beat me to it. That's a bad look for ABQ

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

I was only talking about the decisions and not the accuracy. But really I think even the accuracy was better in this game. In many of the games this year he had a number of throws (4-5?) that were a little behind the receiver, but that didn't seem to be an issue in this one. Not that he didn't have a throw or two that weren't off target, but there are always some of those with every QB.

No, don't get me wrong, this was one of his best games, IMO. I was just saying that I saw two bad throws, rather then just the one but really, I only saw two. Now, I didn't break down the game, didn't have time this week, but I'm pretty certain this was one of his better games for sure.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

No the problem is only three QBs meet your ignorant standard you vaguely heard about and didn't understand but parrot because it supports your dumb narrative. Now to make sure you understand how stupid your point is please regale me with your solution for the 29 teams without Russell Wilson, Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger.

Well, how many QBs should be getting record deals? You hear what you want to hear, not what's actually being said. Maybe you need to push off here and go your own way. You aren't interested in discussing what I'm saying, you are interested in arguing. It's cool, go do that with somebody else.

 

[ActualCowboysFan]

Well, how many QBs should be getting record deals? You hear what you want to hear, not what's actually being said. Maybe you need to push off here and go your own way. You aren't interested in discussing what I'm saying, you are interested in arguing. It's cool, go do that with somebody else.

I was pretty interested in showing how ignorant your take is and you've taken great offense to it. I'm not seeing your proposed solution that has somehow escaped 29, about to be 31, NFL franchises. So please Lombardi let me hear it.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

I agree with you.
Those nights in ABQ were coooooold!
But it was fruitful and we had a good time.

Oh yeah, I forgot to ask you about that. Yeah, this time of year, it cools off a little bit but not horrible like some places, just cool.

How was the club, did you throw your back out?

 

[Aviano90]

Well, how many QBs should be getting record deals? You hear what you want to hear, not what's actually being said. Maybe you need to push off here and go your own way. You aren't interested in discussing what I'm saying, you are interested in arguing. It's cool, go do that with somebody else.

Record deals is the new model of contracts in the NFL. You don’t have to like it or agree with it but the salary cap keeps increasing and salaries keep rising. Dak wouldn’t get a record deal if all QBs negotiated their contract at the same time, but they don’t.

So it really comes down to whether you want to keep Dak or not. You’re not going to change the negotiating methods currently used in the NFL.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

I was pretty interested in showing how ignorant your take is and you've taken great offense to it. I'm not seeing your proposed solution that has somehow escaped 29, about to be 31, NFL franchises. So please Lombardi let me hear it.

Imagine that? You are "pretty interested" in showing another poster how ignorant they are and they take offense...... Humm........ Gotta be something to that.......

I've been pretty clear with you and you basically have done nothing other then argue. Go find that else where. I'm not interested in it, I don't have time to waste on you and there are literally a billion things more worthy of my time, then arguing with you.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

Record deals is the new model of contracts in the NFL. You don’t have to like it or agree with it but the salary cap keeps increasing and salaries keep rising. Dak wouldn’t get a record deal if all QBs negotiated their contract at the same time, but they don’t.

So it really comes down to whether you want to keep Dak or not. You’re not going to change the negotiating methods currently used in the NFL.

In Your Opinion.

 

[ActualCowboysFan]

Imagine that? You are "pretty interested" in showing another poster how ignorant they are and they take offense...... Humm........ Gotta be something to that.......

I've been pretty clear with you and you basically have done nothing other then argue. Go find that else where. I'm not interested in it, I don't have time to waste on you and there are literally a billion things more worthy of my time, then arguing with you.

You said something on a message board. Hilarious how much it offends you that people disagree with it. Everytime you get asked to back it up you try to break out the couch like Sigmund Freud because you know what you said is wrong but you can't admit it.

Still waiting on that elegant solution homie.

 

[Corso]

Oh yeah, I forgot to ask you about that. Yeah, this time of year, it cools off a little bit but not horrible like some places, just cool.

How was the club, did you throw your back out?

Lol. It was some rooftop place called Ibiza. Cold.
I managed to survive after a little imbibing, lol.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

You said something on a message board. Hilarious how much it offends you that people disagree with it. Everytime you get asked to back it up you try to break out the couch like Sigmund Freud because you know what you said is wrong but you can't admit it.

Still waiting on that elegant solution homie.

Not your homie but it's your story, you tell it.

 

[Aviano90]

In Your Opinion.

Well, time is going to tell whose opinion turns out to become reality.

 

[ActualCowboysFan]

Not your homie but it's your story, you tell it.

No it's you that needs to tell that story. Tell everyone how 31 teams are doing it wrong and you've found an answer they've all overlooked. But it's so good you have to keep it a secret. I'm all ears