Penn State continues to mismanage this whole ordeal. Coaches kept in place, students acting like selfish idiots. I feel so badly for the abused kids who had their childhoods and minds warped by this monster.
The truly bizarre and scary story came from Matt Millen's description of Jerry Sandusky and he seemed like the good natured guy. He even took the abused kids to church - what a twisted and sick person is Sandusky??
When civil trials begin with the warped reaction of Penn State how do they get a fair trial when they worship Paterno almost like a deity?
This sounds like a cult with the blind support from so many.
The school is going to get federal scrutinty and this appears to only be the start of many trials.
The Catholic Church trials have specifc outcomes as precedence and Paterno is not out of the woods as are many of the individuals who were in charge.
See this:
Lest there be any confusion that Penn State had simply failed to grasp the severity of an ambiguous situation, the graduate student reported that he “saw a naked boy, Victim 2, whose age he estimated to be ten years old” being raped by Sandusky.
That’s what the leadership at Penn State, apparently up to the University President, thought wasn’t worth bringing to the attention of the police, not even the campus police.
It’s hard to come up with the right words. Appalling. Inexcusable. As a trial lawyer, the word “reckless” jumps out at me. Under Pennsylvania law:
The actor’s conduct is in reckless disregard of the safety of another if he does an act or intentionally fails to do an act which it is his duty to the other to do, knowing or having reason to know of facts which would lead a reasonable man to realize, not only that his conduct creates an unreasonable risk of physical harm to another, but also that such risk is substantially greater than that which is necessary to make his conduct negligent.
That’s from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion Hutchison ex rel. Hutchison v. Luddy, 870 A. 2d 766 (Pa. 2005)(quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 500), a clergy abuse which evaluated a jury verdict which included a one-million-dollar punitive damages award against the Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown after the jury found:
that the Diocesan Parties had knowledge that Luddy was molesting children; that they were negligent in their retention and supervision of Luddy; that they engaged in a pattern and practice of ignoring allegations of pedophilic behavior among priests; and that their negligence was a substantial factor in bringing about harm to [the plaintiff].
http://www.litigationandtrial.com/2...vil-rights-1/penn-state-sexual-abuse-lawsuit/