Yakuza Rich
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,043
- Reaction score
- 12,385
BraveHeartFan;4237357 said:While we're on that subject of knowing him and what not I find this interesting to some degree.
Barry Switzer said yesterday that there is no way that the people on that staff, who work so closely together for so long, didn't know.
Barry was saying that, and drawing that, from his own experience of coaching college football for a long period of time. He made it clear that in his opinion there is absolutely no way that people didn't know.
What are the people's thoughts on that?
I'm just curious about that so please don't take it as an indictment on Joe Pa. I'm not saying it effects anything in anyway at all. I'm just curious as to what people feel about an opinion like that of a coach with more than enough experience in the college coaching world to have some credibility on the subject.
I understand what Barry is saying.
It's extremely possible that in 1998, Paterno had no idea. As one poster posted here...he had a friend and colleague that was a sex addict and getting prostitutes and nobody knew about it. There was a case of a guy in Long Island robbing banks and his wife, plausibly, didn't know about it. Look at the people who had NO idea about the BTK killer.
However, once 1998 happened....and that was investigated by UNIVERSITY police...there's no way Paterno didn't know. These coaches have good connections with the DA, chief of police and chief of university police. I know for a fact that Jim Boeheim has good connections with each of these people and tons of people in the police force. And he is nowhere near the status of Joe Paterno.
It's like Cowherd said...TMZ didn't create rumors and innuendo. Rumors and innuendo (and their popularity) created TMZ.
It's very tight knit in athletic departments. For programs itself, it's even tighter.
Paterno has indicted himself. No way does he go right to the AD in 2002 without once asking or confronting Sandusky.
Everybody but the blind knows this.
YR