He wasn't set up to succeed. So of course he didn't look good.Deuce looked baaaaaad
I mean... when thinking through possible reasons to sign Zeke... I legitimately cannot understand why they would do it. They want to get slower and older at the position? Possibly the pound it in from the goal line more frequently. Although, even that wasn't guaranteed or likely in the days of Zeke.What do you think their logic is (regardless of whether you agree with it)? I can’t think of another reason it would be useful unless he plans on retiring a Cowboy.
No, he didn't. Deuce didn't have an inch of running room all season. He should have worn a big sign that said, "Hey, I'm finally in the game, and they're giving the ball to me!"Deuce looked baaaaaad
Yep , the Circus just keeps rolling....Welcome back my friend, to the show that never ends.
Are you calling Zeke "All Marketing, no Substance"? or are you calling the Dallas Cowboys "All Marketing, no Substance"?Not needed. All marketing, no substance.
He had a bunch of TDs with us his last season. I didn't really follow him at NE -- how did they use him? I think he could be used in short yardage. I don't think they would bring him back to be a main guy.I mean... when thinking through possible reasons to sign Zeke... I legitimately cannot understand why they would do it. They want to get slower and older at the position? Possibly the pound it in from the goal line more frequently. Although, even that wasn't guaranteed or likely in the days of Zeke.
This is actually a good one because of what he can do on a cheap contract.And "they" say Jones boys didnt make any F.A. moves...