JohnnyTheFox
Achilleslastand
- Messages
- 10,418
- Reaction score
- 20,132
yep, Romo would have been crucified. No one I have read has claimed Wilscum made a bad throw
"Wilscum"
Typo?
yep, Romo would have been crucified. No one I have read has claimed Wilscum made a bad throw
Wilson was not impressive at all in this game. He was throwing a lot of jump balls hoping his guy makes a play for him. The Lockett catch was amazing catch but he was well covered with safety help.
You keep Wilson in the pocket and takes away the run you have a good chance to beat him.
Wilson was not impressive at all in this game. He was throwing a lot of jump balls hoping his guy makes a play for him. The Lockett catch was amazing catch but he was well covered with safety help.
You keep Wilson in the pocket and takes away the run you have a good chance to beat him.
Must be nice not to have any blame or labels placed on you when you make a mistake. If Romo makes that INT we are all talking about Romo and his mistakes. But since its Russell Wilson, noones talking about him, but rather Carroll and the play call. I guess the 50+ pass calling plays that he used to have to throw in years past puts tremendous pressure on Romo to succeed or else.
Yep - I've learned my lesson in here. A Super Bowl buys you A LOT of house money with fans. You can virtually do no wrong the rest of your career.
Sorry, that's just not something I'm prepared to take from you. I watched that season, too.
"Wilscum"
Typo?
Change Romo's play caller and we go 12-4... Notice how he didn't force much when he was given more control in the offense.
You mean like the 324 yards passing and 4 TDs they gave up to Brady and the pats? You do know that Wilson had a better QB rating in that game and percentage to Brady right? Since this is how we Judge our QB around here, they would point to that rating and say Romo was better than Brady but since it's Wilson.It kind of shocks me. I don't see what everybody else sees in Wilson. I see a capable guy who's got a good, positive personality and the best situation in football. But he's been a liability the last two games. And it's a mistake to pay him a mega-deal, too. That SEA team wins because of it's defense, and specifically because of it's secondary. It's bizarre to me that that somehow buys the QB a mulligan or three when it comes to evaluating his play in these big games.
Getting a little tired of the obligatory "if Romo would have done that" thread every time a QB makes a bad play.
True and his 506 yds 5TDs 1INT is a prime example of this.You just made the OP's point..
That's how it is with Romo.
He can have 4000 pass attempts and people will recall the handful that went wrong and never forget it.
He can absolutely carry the team, lead them to more comeback wins than almost any QB in history, but if he makes a mistake (even in a fairly meaningless non-division game), it lives on forever and he somehow single handedly lost everything...maybe even world peace.
Exactly the double standards are simply amazing as for Seattle they really blew it and if I'm Lynch, I would really evaluate if I want to remain with that team after that ridiculous play call when Lynch was killing the Pats all game long and at the 1 they pass and it get intercepted epic fail in the annals of Super Bowl history.Same with that pass play. It happens. I can hear Cowboy Nation in my sleep "why aren't we running the ball from the one?".
It's funny though when some people use that as an actual justification to. It doesn't lessen or minimize the mistake made. But Super Bowls distort perceptions, even to the point where some fans think Eli Manning is a Hall of Fame QB.