Give credit to who? Wentz. He hasn't done anything to get credit.
Yeah, four wins as a rookie with no one considered elite at the skill positions is not doing anything?
Wentz has an elite defense.
I'm sorry, is anyone on defense catching balls? Does the defense score all of Philly's points?
....Wentz throws behind the line of scrimmage
You mean the balls he throws are behind the line of scrimmage?
and didn't complete 1 pass over 15 yards. 10 yards and less.
So? When did the criterion for a good quarterback become you had to complete passes 20 yards down the field?
And you'll notice a similar criticism was applied to Dak too, i.e., that he's not accurate with the deep ball, and he takes the short throws. But so what? Those are part of the game also.
That's a silly argument.
I'm not giving credit to that, he lost.
So does Tony Romo. It's interesting to see that you're validating everything that has been said about Romo in your criticism of Wentz.
So take your Wentz loving crap somewhere else because your aren't a Cowboys fan, you're a Wentz fan.
Do you understand how juvenile you sound?
It's pathetic that people are falling for this crap. Wentz has playmakers on offense.
Like who? Darren Sproules? You think Sproules is a playmaker on the order of Zeke Elliott?
You're just making stuff up as you go.
Dak has recievers dropping passes so what.
Wentz has receivers dropping passes too. So what, as you say.
Sproles was out rushing Zeke until the 4th quarter. Stop it
This shows how myopic you are.
First, the Eagles started to feature Sproules as a running back
THIS game. So without him in this position, the Eagles - led by Wentz - won four games. Meanwhile, Zeke has been starting
ALL of the games the Cowboys have played.
Second, you just invalidated your own argument. So if Wentz was winning with Sproules carrying the load, doesn't that make his success squarely on Sproules' shoulders? And if Zeke outrushed Sproules in the fourth quarter, doesn't that mean Dak's success is on Zeke's shoulders?
Oh, and by the way, the Eagles were winning prior to the fourth quarter.
Wentz is good. You may not like it, but he is. And most GMs and coaches outside of the Cowboys coaches and GM would
STILL take Wentz over Dak.
That's not a knock on Dak - except to overly sensitive Cowboys fans. I'm glad we have him. But, as I said, I don't have to alter reality because a player on a division rival is good. Maturity has a way of establishing proper perspective.