I think Romosexual is a better nickname IMO.Yea. It’s perfect. Dak slobberers. Lol
I was surprised it was allowed but the author of it is a well renowned member and critic here. I don’t align with all of his criticism but love that.
I don't know if he would win the Superbowl but we would be a 2 loss team at worst and possibly undefeated.
So he would have his best record ever, despite having absolute trash at receiver and tight end? And despite the fact that he has had comparable defenses before and didn’t go 14-2 or undefeated?
Doubtful.
lolRomo never had a Defense that was this good. He also never got to play with Zeke. Romo’s Quick release, sliding within the pocket, and Houdini escapability would make the o-line better. His accuracy would make Cooper, Beasley, and Gallup better. Too bad Dak makes receivers and the o-line worse.
That’s ok . Romoreuters was better. But slobberers is more graphic I think. I guess it depends what stick your lickingI think Romosexual is a better nickname IMO.
But no one is slobbering dak tho lol. That's whats comical.That’s ok . Romoreuters was better. But slobberers is more graphic I think. I guess it depends what stick your licking
Right. And why the team usually totally collapsed without Romo.Yes because with this team we have a defense and a run game we can fall back on.
When we had Romo the defense was almost always unreliable and the run game was not good except for Barber in spurts in 2007 and 2014 with Demarco.
Romo would also make the Oline better just like he did when we switched to him over Bledsoe.
Dallas with Prime Tony Romo is a No loss to 2 loss team at worst right now.
The run game not being good is bogus. We just wouldn't commit to using it, even when it was working. We were typically top half in the league in average yards per carry but bottom half of league in rushing attempts. We even did well converting 3rd and short running the ball contrary to popular opinion.Yes because with this team we have a defense and a run game we can fall back on.
When we had Romo the defense was almost always unreliable and the run game was not good except for Barber in spurts in 2007 and 2014 with Demarco.
Romo would also make the Oline better just like he did when we switched to him over Bledsoe.
That’s a matter of opinion.But no one is slobbering dak tho lol. That's whats comical.
Right. And why the team usually totally collapsed without Romo.
This team is much more competitive and can win without a good QB. Imagine what it could do with a good QB.
What do you mean. Fans are cheering for Dak because he is our QB this season and fans want to win. You are cheering for him to fail so you can shove your ***** with romo's face on it further up your ***.That’s a matter of opinion.
Very unbiased take here from the "Romonater" lolI love how people
This is complete utter bs. If Dak Prescott doesn’t reveal to you all that Romo was masking for Garrett, then you are just delusional
That’s your interpretation not reality.What do you mean. Fans are cheering for Dak because he is our QB this season and fans want to win. You are cheering for him to fail so you can shove your ***** with romo's face on it further up your ***.
Also...Romo never had a Defense that was this good. He also never got to play with Zeke. Romo’s Quick release, sliding within the pocket, and Houdini escapability would make the o-line better. His accuracy would make Cooper, Beasley, and Gallup better. Too bad Dak makes receivers and the o-line worse.
Go take a poll there is no fan here that thinks Dak is a top 5 QB that should be paid 100 million. You think Romo was a god and would turn **** into gold.That’s your interpretation not reality.
I’m cheering on Jerry to succeed too but I think he’s a big part of why we’re not having more success. Get it?
But romo is the best at calling an audible out of run plays lol.The run game not being good is bogus. We just wouldn't commit to using it, even when it was working. We were typically top half in the league in average yards per carry but bottom half of league in rushing attempts. We even did well converting 3rd and short running the ball contrary to popular opinion.
Here is an article in 2013 wondering why the team won't run.
https://www.si.com/nfl/audibles/2013/12/17/the-all-22-cowboys-run-game-demarco-murray-packers
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000299618/article/packers-happy-cowboys-abandoned-running-game
"That's just who they are," cornerback Tramon Williams said. "They run the ball really well against everybody they play, but they just never stick with it."
"Oh, my God. It's the best zone scheme in the league," Pickett continued. "The last four weeks, nobody could stop it -- their zone scheme. And they gave up on it. We're just happy they did. We were, like, 'OK, we'll take it.'"