The NFL.Com list that I linked to here at least two times already. Dak didn't have his best games before we traded for Cooper. A whole big thing was made about the Cooper trade was worth it because it revived Dak when he was in a downward trend. We've seen Cooper make adjustments before on some badly thrown passes. Dak's season premier game was horrid, several people thought that Dak has regressed. As stated before, just because someone ranks say #8 on year on a ranking list means that he ranks there the next year. That goes against the whole concept that players can improve or regress as well as age or become injury prone. Heck some people on here noted that Brady and Rodgers deserve to be lower on the list because of not being the same players that they once were. If you think it is unfair to rank Dak very low because he has been injured, then it is also unfair to automatically assume he is Top 10 in the league currently based on two games one of which he played very poorly in, the other which he just barely won against the worst team in the NFL. He certainly isn't as bad as the OP has made him out to be, but then I stand by my assertion that so far this season I wouldn't rank Dak above Hurts either.