TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 75,479
- Reaction score
- 69,934
Right!But he'd win it all with the super duper, greatest talent in the world offense in Dallas. They wouldn't even need a defense!
Right!But he'd win it all with the super duper, greatest talent in the world offense in Dallas. They wouldn't even need a defense!
Even so, posters do it all the time. With Dak, for example, some use it against Dak that “he” only went 8-8 last year, and others discount Dak’s contribution to the 13-3 season by saying record is a team thing.It's ridiculous to label it as such.
Dak is good no doubt. He has a chance this season to get everything he wants. Looking forward to the season.I get slammed for this constantly. I actually think Prescott is every bit as good as Mahomes. He got bless than last year Super Bowl. I’m with Terry Bradshaw. I thought he was going to get exposed. Overthrowing under throwing actually aiming the football at one point. And Prescott actually had the same numbers. I’m not a fan of Mahomes obviously. I’ve been watching football since the 60s so . I’m old-school football. This is candy *** **** today
Rodgers didn’t start until year 4, and Jordan Love is not considered a cant miss guy. Accordingly I’m not sure the Packers might not let Love develop a few years.Green Bay drafted a quarterback in the first round. They have to see him play by year two. Rodgers is done there no matter how well he plays.
It should've been. And let's don't act like Marvin Jones, Golladay and Tate were bad when they were together. Stafford just doesn't have "it".This is enough help for an entire team? Are you drunk?
Yeah that's what so was weird about Eagles and Packers taking quarterbacks. Both of those guys are raw. I can see if it was Tua or Burrows but those selections made no sense for those teams.Rodgers didn’t start until year 4, and Jordan Love is not considered a cant miss guy. Accordingly I’m not sure the Packers might not let Love develop a few years.
I'm not rooting for Dak leaving.Again, nonsense.
Dallas isn't letting Dak go when they can tag him again just to pay Stafford 27AAV over 3 or more years if they can even get him that cheaply.
They aren't paying Dak 5 years to tag him for just the one so that point is moot.
Stafford isn't coming in for 1 year and DET won't cut him except as a post June 1st move and likely after they talk restructure or buying his freedom.
Exactly zero teams would prefer Matt Stafford to Dak Prescott.
Dallas would go draft an R1 QB and take their chances because they'd have cost certainty for 5 seasons.
Dallas has A LOT of picks next year and can move up in R1 to take a QB.
Is that dumb compared to keeping Dak? Sure is which is why they would just tag him a 2nd time and try to go with a title.
But they aren't bringing in an aging, beat up Stafford to stop gap.
I love how your responses are always “you don’t know what you’re talking about” never adding any substance. You sound like a teenagerLolololol...your knowledge in football is equally as bad as your knowledge in soccer
According to the scouting reports he has the same issues you guys say Dak has. He "throws a pretty spiral" but he's wildly inaccurate.
According to what though? Just personal preference? That's fine if so...Would still give Matt the passing edge over Dak. I am in the middle on Dak, so I don't beat him up one way or the other probably one of 2 that thinks like that on this board about Dak, most on here either loves him or hate him, but Matt is a overall better passer.
I think I fall into the trap of assuming I'm talking to adults on here.....but wouldn't shock me if he's a teenager. The real mind F's are when you see someone is actually 50 or 60 but acting like a teenager.I love how your responses are always “you don’t know what you’re talking about” never adding any substance. You sound like a teenager
You can’t do that anymore. A first round pick has to play because of the salary cap. Name me one first round pick recently that sat the bench his second year?Rodgers didn’t start until year 4, and Jordan Love is not considered a cant miss guy. Accordingly I’m not sure the Packers might not let Love develop a few years.
Stafford has a great arm, no doubt better than Dak. But there are other factors that go into the QB position, and I would give Dak the edge in other areas.Would still give Matt the passing edge over Dak. I am in the middle on Dak, so I don't beat him up one way or the other probably one of 2 that thinks like that on this board about Dak, most on here either loves him or hate him, but Matt is a overall better passer.
He’s never won a playoff game and has a horrible record against winning teams as well which is what everyone is knocking Dak for from last year. So I really don’t understand the reasoning. Not to mention staffords back is done. What happened last time we rolled into a season with a guy with a history of back issues? Didn’t even make it out of preseason and we ended up throwing Dak into the fire.It should've been. And let's don't act like Marvin Jones, Golladay and Tate were bad when they were together. Stafford just doesn't have "it".
He also sucks at beating winning teams, winning in the playoffs, and staying healthy. He won’t be making any superior passes from the massage table.Stafford is certainly very viable, and actually a superior passer than Dak.
According to what though? Just personal preference? That's fine if so...