xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,217
- Reaction score
- 64,730
Two separate issues:I was telling this board that years ago.
They’d rather lose with Dak. Trust me.
1. The % of SB winning QBs that were on rookie contracts is small.
2. Dak.
Two separate issues:I was telling this board that years ago.
They’d rather lose with Dak. Trust me.
Yes he beat a losing team, against a GOAT who was off to the knackers yard. No doubting he had a tremendous game, against poor opposition.He beat the GOAT on the road and had a tremendous game.
and my point all along. the contract hasn't impailed the FO to build a team around him. his cap hit was less than Lamar Jackson this year? somehow Ravens built a team. we had 20M on the cap last year. somehow it went unspent. we had 10 M (6th in the league) in cap space this season. somehow it went unspent. this year we had about 25M and were able to sign diggs and couple of other FAs....They're saying that Dak doesn't deserve to be paid such a big contract. Which okay if they believe he hasn't earned the money that is one point. However I don't see how them viewing a QB as being worthy or unworthy of a big contract somehow changes their logic of how a QB being paid a certain amount of money makes it impossible for a front office to build a team around him.
SO even in the scenario of the Cowboys moving on from Dak and drafting a rookie QB. They're saying that the Cowboys have a limited window to win a Super Bowl on that QB's rookie contract. Or that Cowboys will be doomed not to win a Super Bowl if he gets signed to a new deal before being able to win one. And they're saying the Joneses hands will be tied and they won't be able to do anything to keep and build a Super Bowl contending roster around the next Cowboys QB once he gets paid.
Don't see how the argument of whether or not a QB is deserving of getting paid a big contract would make a difference in the logic that it's impossible for an NFL front office to build a team once their QB has been paid. Since limited money is still limited money and cap space is still cap space for an NFL team, in this argument some are trying to use.
Yes but dak has showed he cannot deliver on both , rookie or expensive contracts. This is still overall on the GM. but once you realize the QB is not the solution , and cannot solve problems you have , you need to move on.As @Flamma indicated earlier, it's the CAP% HIT that matters not the rookie status of the contract eg Stafford still won his SB with low % (as he was still on his cheap 1st year of the contract). The problem with Dak's extension is that it'll need to be long term to spread out the existing deferred payments (and the $34m 2024 salary which I bet France will want included).
Mahomes/Brady can carry a team, lesser QB's on big contracts Cap hit% never seem to work when they need tools/weapons.
mahomes won his first SB while costing KC a ridiculously low cap hit , i thnk 6 million or something.KC won the 2022 season SB.
- "Patrick Mahomes signed a 10 year, $450 million contract extension with the Chiefs on July 6, 2020."
Very few SB winning QBs were on their rookie contract.
Just by memory:
- The 1st one with Mahomes.
- The 2017 season Eagles.
- 2007 season Giants with Eli.
Between 2007 season (Eli) and 2017 season (Eagles) were there any other rookie contract QBs that won the SB?
Only 1 of Tom Brady's SB wins was during his rookie contract.
Since some Cowboys fans have this mindset about it being impossible for a front office to build a team around a QB after he has been paid. I'm curious to see their list of QBs coming out of college the next couple of years who they believe can win the Cowboys a Super Bowl on his rookie contract and that's with the current mentality, approach and philosophy the Joneses have taken when it comes to roster building this team. And running this franchise as a whole.and my point all along. the contract hasn't impailed the FO to build a team around him. his cap hit was less than Lamar Jackson this year? somehow Ravens built a team. we had 20M on the cap last year. somehow it went unspent. we had 10 M (6th in the league) in cap space this season. somehow it went unspent. this year we had about 25M and were able to sign diggs and couple of other FAs....
so this salary thing stopping us from building a team is meaningless. every team deals with it. and when Dak was on Rookie contract, we still couldn't build a team.
teams make it to the superbowl, CCGs, etc. with QBs on new contracts. if only teams on Rookie contracts would make it to the CCG or Superbowls, then nobody would resign them or would it make sense to resign them.
now, is he deserving? that's an opinion. the market sets the value. not fan opinion and their anger.
There is no evidence whatsoever that Dak’s contract kept us from signing a single free agent.But Purdy isnt paid like an elite QB. It is Dak's contract that's effecting us from succeeding, because we fail to pay it off and it's kicked down the alley. Its on Dak to take the team friendly deal (by team friendly I mean length of contract).
A Dak specialty when stats add upAnd that 6 minutes was against a prevent defense.
Just as an fyi, Baltimore is pretty infamous for collapsing in games.Yes but dak has showed he cannot deliver on both , rookie or expensive contracts. This is still overall on the GM. but once you realize the QB is not the solution , and cannot solve problems you have , you need to move on.
GB moved on from Rodgers and seem to be doing much better than the cowboys .
If you look at what mahomes and lamar ( not comparing them to dak) , they carry their teams and find ways to win. Dak finds ways to lose .
So Reid is fat and smart, while McCarthy is fat and dumb. Better?There's no reason to make the guy's weight be a part of it. Andy Reid who you also mentioned is also obese, proving it's about your mind as a head coach not if you can run laps with the players.
And that was well off peak Brady. There's always a lot of talk. Lots of hype. That's professional marketing. Big advertising dollars at stake.Lol, before the game, the hot take was that Dak can't beat Brady.
I'm talking about the fans, many of them right here that said that Dak can't beat Brady.And that was well off peak Brady. There's always a lot of talk. Lots of hype. That's professional marketing. Big advertising dollars at stake.
That's the new take. However, Dak was outstanding in that game.Greates of all time does not mean greatest at THAT time.
It's possible.That's the new take. However, Dak was outstanding in that game.
I guess I can't speak for them. But Dak did not beat Brady. They Cowboys beat the Bucs.I'm talking about the fans, many of them right here that said that Dak can't beat Brady.
yes he has chocked a lot . but also won several games including playoffs games , when his offense had stalled.Just as an fyi, Baltimore is pretty infamous for collapsing in games.
Also, in Lamar’s four playoff losses, his team has only scored 10 points in each one.