McKDaddy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,021
- Reaction score
- 9,470
Because we saw all the other plays as wellI don't know how anyone can see that INT in the end zone and think this guy should see snaps in an NFL game on a competitive team.
Because we saw all the other plays as wellI don't know how anyone can see that INT in the end zone and think this guy should see snaps in an NFL game on a competitive team.
It doesn't matter lol. You can't win games with 5 INTs and two fumbles. This is as bad as a QB can possibly be:Because we saw all the other plays as well
In other words, he can't throw the ball downfield without turning the ball over. They are telling you he is a bad quarterback.You realize that against the Chargers we had 561 total yards, 30 first downs, 53% third down efficiency & 33% 4th down efficiency. This is a line from PFF's write up "Lance weaved in five interceptions with a flurry of big-time throws and a long touchdown run".
Regardless his shortcomings at this time, it's not fair to say that his presence wouldn't present the defense with additional stress.
It doesn't matter lol. You can't win games with 5 INTs and two fumbles. This is as bad as a QB can possibly be:
This is just a case of people choosing to see the positive and ignoring the negative - the exact opposite of what ppl do with Dak.
huh.... well if it is the offense, it worked to the tune of 36td passes and 9 picks last year. Give me more of that kind of offense and less of Trey sorry lance.Makes me wonder if some of it is McCarthy's offense because I see this type of thing with Dak quite a bit. Kurt Warner talked about a pure progression system and how it makes things tougher on the QB at times.
When I watch the all-22 videos, Dak will have 4 defenders on 2 receivers to his right and 2 on 2 to his left and he drops back looking to his right.
they all play the same teams, essentially... so spare me of the schedule.Except when they played good teams or coaches. The Cowboys schedule last year was weak and the defense and offense fell apart every game against good teams or coaches
It doesn't matter lol. You can't win games with 5 INTs and two fumbles. This is as bad as a QB can possibly be:
This is just a case of people choosing to see the positive and ignoring the negative - the exact opposite of what ppl do with Dak.
Doesn't mean it is on every play but it is clear as day if you watch any breakdowns.huh.... well if it is the offense, it worked to the tune of 36td passes and 9 picks last year. Give me more of that kind of offense and less of Trey sorry lance.
It doesn't matter lol. You can't win games with 5 INTs and two fumbles. This is as bad as a QB can possibly be:
This is just a case of people choosing to see the positive and ignoring the negative - the exact opposite of what ppl do with Dak.
So you just ignore all the evidence that he did throw the ball down field. Nice.In other words, he can't throw the ball downfield without turning the ball over. They are telling you he is a bad quarterback.
It is fair. Teams would love for the Cowboys to give Lance possessions.
I'm not. I'm saying that he can't throw it downfield without turning it over, because he does not see the field. It's what I've been saying all preseason. Ironically, his INTs were mostly on the short stuff, which is even worse.So you just ignore all the evidence that he did throw the ball down field. Nice.
Pedants going to pedant.You actually can. Romo did it against (pretty sure) giants.
Never said they did.Not a single person on this forum has made an excuse for this interception.
Dak now, would deserve the criticism.Never said they did.
What they are doing is ignoring it for the good stuff. If Dak threw this pick, you chuckleheads would all be saying how Lance should be playing, regardless of any context around it.
No, you're saying that he deserves regular-season snaps on a playoff team.Dak now, would deserve the criticism.
Dak as a rookie or early in his career in a preseason game, everyone said "hey, it's a mistake. mistakes can be corrected"
Which is exactly what I'm saying with Lance.
Oh....a "mirror detail", eh? Lol...better check your facts first next time.Pedants going to pedant.
Not a playoff team yet.No, you're saying that he deserves regular-season snaps on a playoff team.
I am 100% saying that having packages for him is justified. He needs experience & you are already paying him. He can do things that no other QB on the team can do and that gives the team an advantage other teams would have to prepare for.No, you're saying that he deserves regular-season snaps on a playoff team.
He's a QB that needs reps, get thoes ugly mistakes out of the way so we can develop.watch the first drive and Lance was impressive and throwing dimes, looked like Aikman out there with his ball placement. Then the whole thing fell apart, so who is Trey Lance? That is the question.