Bleu Star;1323976 said:I never professed such a thing. I, like most others on here that contribute ideas and opinions, have a strong opinion. Nothing more.
BigDFan5;1323984 said:Ok now you have screwed up your whole position, you are currently saying he should be fired because of his record and no playoff wins, but you have now chaged that to even if he wins 10 games and wins playoff games you still want him fired.
Your problem is not with winning your problem is with Parcells. You have shown clearly that even if he wins in the playoffs you want him gone even though you said you wangted him gone because he coudnt win in the playoffs
In your world we get rid of a playoff coach for someone like wade phillips and think that all the sudden we win the superbowl. That wont happen with the scheme change and staff turnover
summerisfunner;1323991 said:so did Hitler
Bleu Star;1324001 said:Don't try to twist it up. My contention is clear. Bill was brought in for one reason and one reason only. That was and still is to get us to a Super Bowl. At the time he was the coach pegged as the savior and everyone was all tingly inside over the signing. Well, have we now tempered our expectations? One playoff win in 5 years is enough? So if he wins a first round playoff game next year do we sign him back up for another 4 years? When is enough enough?
Bleu Star;1323219 said:You're barking up the wrong tree. I've personally started two threads concerning Parcells. One clearly pertained to him and his lack of ability to decided what he's going to do and this one pertaining to him and his parcellsisms.
Bleu Star;1323197 said:Are there other threads eluding to his catch phrases and how old they've become?
Billy Bullocks;1324311 said:But so have many other people. This thread adds nothing to this board. It's been said so many times.
Dave_in-NC;1324375 said:As old as these threads have become.
BigDFan5;1324019 said:But now that we seem to have alot of pieces in place you want to change systems and schemes and coaching staff etc. Sorry not me, I want a chance at a superbowl
Bleu Star;1324385 said:Perception... Dan Marino had a lot of pieces in place for many years. What's your point?
summerisfunner;1324387 said:Dan Marino had a running game?
Bleu Star;1324399 said:Tony Romo has an Oline?
summerisfunner;1324402 said:nope, and I guess Don Shula is a shmuck, he couldnt win a Super Bowl w/ Marino
he wasted all his talents!
Bleu Star;1324406 said:Yep. Parcells is no Shula...
Jay-D;1323293 said:10 THINGS THAT EXCITE ME ABOUT 2007
1. New defensive coordinator
2. Continued development of Romo
3. TO's hand is back to 100%
4. Marco Rivera is replaced
5. Bobby Carpenter's continued development
6. Roy Williams will come back with a vengance
7. Sense of "unfinished business" from 2006
8. Free agent aquisitions
9. Parity means EVERYONE is competetive
10. Romo will no longer hold on kicks
Now print that off and tape it to your forehead and finish the rest of the Kool Aid in your half-empty glass. You can consider yourself "clued".
summerisfunner;1324407 said:he's got 1 more Super Bowl ring
ZING!
Bleu Star;1324423 said:He's got that thing called undefeated. ZZING!
summerisfunner;1324429 said:2 Super Bowls >>>> undefeated season