Sydla
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 60,109
- Reaction score
- 91,938
Another stupid speculative take by the stupid Dak haters. Pure fantasy.
What?
The guy advocating the Chargers sign him is a Dak hater?
Another stupid speculative take by the stupid Dak haters. Pure fantasy.
Number 1 in yards only. Not number 1 scoring or points per game which are way better indicators. 0 wins when trailing at halftime...Yeah, shame on Dak for having the #1 ranked offense, he was totally exposed. The defense, special teams, and coaching were exposed, I'll grant you that but Dak and the offense was the best part of the team.
really two first rounders, eating Rivers left over cap space, and paying dak over 35?Although I don't necessarily agree, consider that non-quarterbacks such as LT Laremy Tunsil and CB Jalen Ramsey were dealt last year in packages that included two first-rounders as the article points out.......
"Sign Dak Prescott: Crazy, right? Let's play it out. If the Dallas Cowboys continue to drag their feet on a long-term extension for their two-time Pro Bowler, they'll certainly place the franchise tag on him in the coming weeks. And if they put the non-exclusive tag on Prescott — unlikely, yes, if they go to the trouble of franchising him — the Chargers would be wise to start scheming. Prescott, 26, has further upside despite throwing for 4,902 yards and 30 TDs in 2019. There are a ton of Cowboys fans in Southern California (and everywhere), which is why Dallas holds training camp there annually — keeping Chargers Prescott jerseys in inventory might be tough."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nf...m-brady-or-dak-prescott-head-to-la/ar-BBZZYdq
I'll donate my brother-in-laws dog house in Chico....for whatever it's worth.
I'll drive him there.
What?
The guy advocating the Chargers sign him is a Dak hater?
No, it is just speculation for speculation's sake to fill in a dead time in all likelihood.Did you read the article? It's written by USA today writer, Nate Davis.
You know what that means? Yeah, it's not speculation by some "stupid Dak hater."
I've put up with Jerry this long and I have suffered with Dak over the past couple of years . . . I am good.He's not going to another team despite your petulant temper tantrum. Do you promise to go to another team when he's inevitably signed by the Cowboys?
I got the gas and trolls.
I've put up with Jerry this long and I have suffered with Dak over the past couple of years . . . I am good.
But it's you who is obbsessed over the Man. I am wondering if he ends up on another team will you follow him.
Also this accusation . . . "your petulant temper tantrum." Is a reflection of you and every comment you make
Who? There used to be a newspaper guy in Dallas a long time ago that I couldn't stand, I think his name was Bayless but he's gone. I wonder what happened to him? Cowherd doesn't ring a bell.Do you feel the same when Bayless or Cowherd spew their nonsense to drive up their ratings?
Nate Davis is not a paragon of virtue. He is a purveyor of propaganda, a facilitator of fake news. His cause is to only sell the USA Today Sports section. The article is complete nonsense.
You should feel shame for spreading his lies. But as we all know, Dak haters have no shame and so they will say anything to make waves with the Dak fans.
I'm retired and you called me "boy". That really did make me laugh. Block button? I don't seem to have that feature, troll.And every post you make is cheerleading time.
You know where the block button is. Use it boy
#DontpayDak
I'll drive him there.
The only people on this forum that are getting their collective panties wadded, are the Dakota Apologists. The rest of us are pretty chill and just kickin back and watching the show.