Rank the Cowboys WR Corp Against Playoff Teams

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,798
Reaction score
39,092
Minnesota has been overrated for longer than the Cowboys

Its nothing new.

Regular season mahomes is not as good as playoff mahomes is more of where I'm going w this

If we're playing on turf throughout the playoffs I'd say we had a better shot.

If we draw Philly or Sf we're One and Done imo simply because we don't have a playoff level grass pedigree and they have better overall teams

Minnesota has cousins and come playoff time he'll just be the avg up and down QB that he always has been

Just like Tannehill

I look at today, not last year or years before. NFL has too much turnover in personnel every year. Minn may get beat but facts are facts this season they are 10-2 and a top contending team.
 

CowboysExchange

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
557
that is your opinion. This season Dallas beaten Minn, we have beaten Cinn both playoff contenders

We also lost to Brady and Rogers too

And of course that's not in the the playoff era Js

Any given team can beat another team during the regular season

Washington beat Philly because of a penalty and a couple of fluke turnovers but I betcha they'll be protecting that ball in the playoffs

If they played them 17 games they prolly win at least 15 or 16
 

CowboysExchange

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
557
I look at today, not last year or years before. NFL has too much turnover in personnel every year. Minn may get beat but facts are facts this season they are 10-2 and a top contending team.
playoff contenders yes

Superbowl contenders? Lmao

That's like banking on Tannehill when they were the #1 seed

Those avg qbs have a hard time winning 3 playoff games js

Hurts is on that avg list as a passer but he has great legs and that's been a difference maker for Philly imo
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,798
Reaction score
39,092
playoff contenders yes

Superbowl contenders? Lmao

That's like banking on Tannehill when they were the #1 seed

Those avg qbs have a hard time winning 3 playoff games js

Mathew Stafford won after how many years? while some may think he is great I don't, I think he is a good QB. Cousin, I see the same good QB capable
 

CowboysExchange

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
557
Mathew Stafford won after how many years? while some may think he is great I don't, I think he is a good QB. Cousin, I see the same good QB capable
I dont think Stafford is that great either but he had great talent around him on both sides of the ball.

And they ran an exclusive 11 personell which is a better passing offense than our designated blocking scheme lol

We gotta get better at passing in the 11 personell

Come playoff time these great blocking tes will morph into a liability at the skilled position. Like they always do.

If garropulo wouldnt have choked it may have been sf w a ring

You had 2 game mgrs in that nfc championship game.
 
Last edited:

StarOfGlory

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,885
Reaction score
5,176
Why are you using TE? The thread say WR corp, not overall receiving corp.

IMO CeeDee and Gallup are as I put it "about a push" with their top 2. Gallup is just now getting healthy and we played with a backup QB for half the year so you can't just pull stats. Not sure why you are saying that I said Gallup is better than Smith and Schultz is better than Goedert. I didn't say that. Also, Brown has played as well as Watkins.
You really believe that CD/Gallup is a push with Brown/Smith? I didn't know crack was legal in Texas. And I included the TE (as did a number of posters) because TE's these days are used as WR's are, even moreso in a few offensives.

Our real advantage is Dak.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,798
Reaction score
39,092
I dont think Stafford is that great either but he had great talent around him on both sides of the ball.

And they ran an exclusive 11 personell which is a better passing offense than our designated blocking scheme lol

We gotta get better at passing in the 11 personell

Come playoff time these great blocking tes will morph into a liability at the skilled position. Like they always do.

If garropulo wouldnt have choked it may have been sf w a ring

You had 2 game mgrs in that nfc championship game.

I'm tired of the routine, Dallas can't beat any one yet when they do that team is overrated. Again I don't give a crap of what happened last year, mean nothing and counts for nothing.
 

Wangchung83

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,976
Reaction score
1,482
Lol nice work!
That’s all this thread was created for, they want to make excuses for when Dak Chokes it away again. My prediction is Dak will not score enough points, throw interceptions, not convert on third down, be unable to over come penalties, etc. He will be blamed and this will be one of the excuses. He’s had weapons better than or equal to everyone in the past and didn’t win when it mattered. If you want to blame the defense then put the money on the denfensive side of the ball, otherwise it’s on Dak to score more points than the other team. We have the 2nd highest paid offense vs 27th paid defense. We don’t invest in defense so we shouldn’t blame them when our run d doesn’t hold up. This is in large part due to a 40mil dollar QB that some on here want to place blame on anyone and everyone but him. This year is the year he needs to win, but if he loses, his supporters will say his wr group wasn’t good enough. Lamb was great in college, he’s top tier in the nfl, is Jefferson better? He’s better than a lot, but he’s not leaps and bounds better by any means. This is a smoke screen for an excuse in the making if we fail in the playoffs. Oh and if I’m told to get another team, please just bite your tongue bc that’s called deflection. I am a Cowboy and support everyone on the team, but don’t believe Dak(one player on team) will be taking us to the promise land. My response to me going and getting another team is why don’t you take Dak to another team and I’ll keep being a cowboy for the other 52guys on the roster;).
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,371
Reaction score
10,208
That’s all this thread was created for, they want to make excuses for when Dak Chokes it away again. My prediction is Dak will not score enough points, throw interceptions, not convert on third down, be unable to over come penalties, etc. He will be blamed and this will be one of the excuses. He’s had weapons better than or equal to everyone in the past and didn’t win when it mattered. If you want to blame the defense then put the money on the denfensive side of the ball, otherwise it’s on Dak to score more points than the other team. We have the 2nd highest paid offense vs 27th paid defense. We don’t invest in defense so we shouldn’t blame them when our run d doesn’t hold up. This is in large part due to a 40mil dollar QB that some on here want to place blame on anyone and everyone but him. This year is the year he needs to win, but if he loses, his supporters will say his wr group wasn’t good enough. Lamb was great in college, he’s top tier in the nfl, is Jefferson better? He’s better than a lot, but he’s not leaps and bounds better by any means. This is a smoke screen for an excuse in the making if we fail in the playoffs. Oh and if I’m told to get another team, please just bite your tongue bc that’s called deflection. I am a Cowboy and support everyone on the team, but don’t believe Dak(one player on team) will be taking us to the promise land. My response to me going and getting another team is why don’t you take Dak to another team and I’ll keep being a cowboy for the other 52guys on the roster;).

If you’re looking for a QB focused discussion please go to an actual QB focused thread. Thanks.
 

CowboysExchange

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
557
We really only have 2 big playmakers in our passing game. And some of those teams have better oc's

CeeDee and Pollard

That's the only 2 clutch guys playoff teams will have to stop

Dak needs more separation by all of our receivers

One more potent 3rd receiver would help.

I'd give up a 1st round pick rn just to have cooper back for the playoffs Js

Hopefully James Washington can morph into something he's never been js
 
Last edited:

aikemirv

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,445
Reaction score
10,043
I'm sorry I don't have the same dislike of Moore, as others do. He has had to deal with starting QB going down and yet this team is still showing a lot of success. Offense has increased in production. I see balance in the offense , not strictly running it or strictly passing it. Does this mean I agree with every single play he calls? no but by and large he has been getting it done. As many people who come down on Dak and yet this offense is producing it is amazing how little credit Moore gets from them
Not dislike. I think he designs good plays but he does not have a great feel for playcalling.

For example, two straight end arounds for CeeDee and then nothing off that for the rest of the game other than him being in motion. No fakes, no nothing. Everything is disjointed - it does not seem to build off each other. He had one drive early in the year where is was all 2-3 TE personnel and we passed the ball down the field and we have not seen anything like that since.

He is an enigma!
 

CowboysExchange

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
557
Mathew Stafford won after how many years? while some may think he is great I don't, I think he is a good QB. Cousin, I see the same good QB capable
I'd say
And Pollard isn’t lining up as a WR any time soon…
It would be better than Fergie or hendershot that I'm not mistaken about.

I remember falling way behind Detroit in the playoffs w those 2 scrub tes also. But we got that lucky no call penalty on our lb and 2 strip fumbles in a row by Gregory getting to Stafford lol

We're excellent at creating pressure on defense but we have big holes in or defense also.

Its just gonna boil down to whether this offense can shine offensively against a Superbowl caliber team and in the playoffs prolly passing

I just see this te core getting dominated by defenses. They'll only make a few take what the defense gives ya receptions

And we have a history of playing from behind the last time I checked js
 
Last edited:

CowboysExchange

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
557
Schultz and Gallop some say aren't as good this year at getting separation.

Well that's because Cooper and CeeDee were both drawing coverage away from Gallop and Schultz'kowski (not just CeeDee)

I'd say we were a contender if we still had Cooper and ran a near exclusive 11 personnel scheme well

I'm not a big believer of a regular diet of 12 personell without having good receiving tes that can score when it matters

Who cares what these tes can do against Detroit, Chicago, or our division

This is an NFC East bred team that doesn't have a grass pedigree.

It may beat Kirk cousins but that's about it at this point folks. Maybe Tyron will add a better dimension that we've yet to see. I'm praying

I think Philly at home or Sf wherever will dominate us if we draw them.

Stopping Mccaffery and Deebo run combinations is a pretty tough feet in itself

If sf had a decent running QB that was just a game mgr like hurts they'd be the overwhelming favorite behind their coaching imo

I don't like drawing Brady either. He's beat us twice on opening day

Are my missing any other teams w could draw in the playoffs that we could beat outside of cousins
 
Last edited:

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,371
Reaction score
10,208
Schultz and Gallop some say aren't as good this year at getting separation.

Well that's because Cooper and CeeDee were both drawing coverage away from Gallop and Schultz'kowski (not just CeeDee)

I'd say we were a contender if we still had Cooper and ran a near exclusive 11 personnel scheme well

I'm not a big believer of a regular diet of 12 personell without having good receiving tes that can score when it matters

Cooper was the definition of what I think we need now. Just such a good separator. Obviously he’s a #1 but just someone with quick feet, good route running and that can finish.

Most teams in todays modern NFL need 3 solid WRs. I understand we’re run heavy and use a lot of 2/3 TE sets so I think we’d be fine with just 1 more piece.
 

DanA

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,988
Reaction score
5,804
Eagles, Niners, Bucs, Bengals, Dolphins are only teams with a better WR corp IMO

Those are probably the only ones clearly better. I’d add a few more like the Vikings (Jefferson/Thielen) but that’s perhaps questionable.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,371
Reaction score
10,208
Those are probably the only ones clearly better. I’d add a few more like the Vikings (Jefferson/Thielen) but that’s perhaps questionable.

I think the addition of Hock clearly puts the Vikings over us.
 

CowboysExchange

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
557
Cooper was the definition of what I think we need now. Just such a good separator. Obviously he’s a #1 but just someone with quick feet, good route running and that can finish.

Most teams in todays modern NFL need 3 solid WRs. I understand we’re run heavy and use a lot of 2/3 TE sets so I think we’d be fine with just 1 more piece.
one more piece to run in a non 12 personell group I'm hoping is your guess. Lol

Our starting te is gonna be an 11 million non factor

If it wasn't for making Pollard a main cog in our offense this receiving and TE core woulda dropped off more imo

It looked better w cooper

But they took Schultz'kowski instead and just as predicted they aren't as spectacular even though our run attack has more balance.

Instead of making the best team decision and keeping Coop and snatching up Hayden Hurst at te we got geseckied lmao
 
Last edited:
Top