- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
I don't see it as murky. He came to a settlement with the alleged victim who in turn, pretty much disappeared, leading to the dismissal.
That wasn't the part that was particularly murky, but even the DA did not comment on whether or not a settlement had been reached in the case. Did she settle? Did she not want to bring the charges in a criminal court for some other reason? Was it a combination of the two things? It's really hard to say, and if we're going on the information that's being related to us by the press right now, keep in mind that this morning was the first anybody even had a whiff that the key witness in the state's case hadn't been cooperative or even heard from since Nov of last year. We're getting information that's incomplete and/or pretty heavily filtered at this point.
I was referring to the 911 tapes in this case and to what little is publicly available about the altercation as being 'murky.' There were allegations of guns, and of her attacking him with her shoe, there was him on the phone with 911 while directing his agent (?) to keep her from getting to him. There were comments from his neighbor who was obviously very much afraid of Greg Hardy. I don't know what you thought/think when hearing them, but, like most of these cases, it wasn't very cut-and-dry.