CanadianCowboysFan
Lightning Rod
- Messages
- 25,373
- Reaction score
- 8,148
jimmy40;3270627 said:yeah, I've always been known as a huge homer.
well you did pick us to win one game last year homer
jimmy40;3270627 said:yeah, I've always been known as a huge homer.
goshan;3270638 said:Anyone who won't admit Brees looked better than Romo is totally a homer. I don't think Romo goes 32 for 37 in that game.
I love Romo - he is top 5-7 QB in the NFL. But Brees accuracy and decision making were absolutely superb. He is a notch better than Tony right now - largely because he is calmer under pressure and just amazingly accurate. He senses pressure earlier and calmly throws it short to an open RCVR before the lineman is totally in his face.
Cowboy Junkie;3271823 said:Garrett really must go, he just does not have it! yes some games he does a very good job but he does not go with the strengths of the team. almost like he is stubborn he does not adjust well during the games...
Don Corleone;3271972 said:
I hope you realize that he is learning on the fly. Sean Payton didn't become a genius overnight. He was stripped of his play calling duties in New York, before he arrived at Dallas and made a name for himself again.
The fact is that Garrett has been improving over the years. He has a ways to go, but no one can deny that improvement has been steady.
Be careful what you ask for.
Austinrocks;3270622 said:As usual, Cowboy homers cannot see the light! This board has zero unbiased people on it, not really a forum board, more like a Cowboy cheer camp. Don't waste your time killing me, I need to get back to my stocks, gone for the day.
Austinrocks;3270622 said:gone for the day.
starfrombirth;3271902 said:What pressure? With the exception of 1 sack, Brees has all night to pick apart Indy's defense. God! There was no pressure at all on him. Speaking of trolls.
clutch88;3271013 said:Stop making excuses for Romo he is just good enough to get one playoff win that's it, the sooner we stop kidding ourselves the better.
The Dodger;3271084 said:Hey, here's a free clue for ya: football is a team sport.
goshan;3270679 said:3. Romo would not have gone 32/37 in that game and we know it. When has he done that??
Don Corleone;3271972 said:
I hope you realize that he is learning on the fly. Sean Payton didn't become a genius overnight. He was stripped of his play calling duties in New York, before he arrived at Dallas and made a name for himself again.
The fact is that Garrett has been improving over the years. He has a ways to go, but no one can deny that improvement has been steady.
Be careful what you ask for.
casmith07;3270601 said:That one key INT lost the 2nd biggest game of Manning's career.
I'm not sure you want to just blow that off. A weak attempt to bash Romo, at best, and yes I saw where you said you aren't knocking Romo. With the protection Brees got tonight, Romo would pick anyone in the NFL apart.
Austinrocks;3270622 said:As usual, Cowboy homers cannot see the light! This board has zero unbiased people on it, not really a forum board, more like a Cowboy cheer camp. Don't waste your time killing me, I need to get back to my stocks, gone for the day.
dallascowboyfanboy;3270806 said:Nope it doesnt. I am a diehard Cowboys fan but I don't support every player like a homer does.
LandryFan;3271536 said:I can't believe the mods let this idiot troll hang around.
I'm pretty sure this guy is the old "cowboyrocks" (aka skinsrock) character. Same exact MO.
zrinkill;3272062 said:Wrong as usual.
Austinrocks;3270622 said:As usual, Cowboy homers cannot see the light! This board has zero unbiased people on it, not really a forum board, more like a Cowboy cheer camp. Don't waste your time killing me, I need to get back to my stocks, gone for the day.
BraveHeartFan;3270894 said:#2 I can honestly see people making a case for that and I don't have any issue with it. It's subjective from person to person but a case can certainly be made for Brees being a little better.
Though I can make the cause that Romo is the better Qb just as easily, so it goes both ways. But, for your question, yes I could easily agree with you on that.
#3 I don't agree. you have ZERO idea what he could do in that game, against that defense, with that kind of protection.
Lets not act like Brees went 32 of 37 in the game while running around, scrambling, having to make time for his receivers cause his O-Line is painfully average. Brees had ALL DAY to make those plays cause he has an O-Line that can actually pass block very well.
So you have zero idea of what Romo could or couldn't do in the same situation.
Not me. I hated Hambrick with a passion. Emmitt is my all time favorite Cowboy and I felt he still showed back then that while he wasn't as good as he once was he was still more than good enough to produce. I always felt that Hambrick was a by-product of teams not worrying about the run when Emmitt wasn't in the game and so it helped make Hambrick look better than he ever was.
Which I do believe panned out to be reality the moment Emmitt was no long there.
OOOOOOOOOOOOH! That one left a mark.
I can see how someone is making that claim based off the body of work. I don't know how anyone would honestly take Warner over Romo in the present as the QB you'd rather have going forward but I can definately see how they put Warner above him based on the entire body of work to this point.
Of course that wasn't really the question as it's the top 5 in the NFL right now and not top 5 based on their entire career.
And this surprises you? It should have been pretty obvious over the last 2 years that there are still a few fans that don't quite realise what they've got.
RW Hitman;3273013 said:this is a very good series of posts.
silverbear;3272979 said:Wonder what kind of rock he'll be when he comes back??
LOL...