Pessimist_cowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,911
- Reaction score
- 15,295
Romo re-structuring has nothing to do with Greg Hardy . Maybe they'd like to re-sign spencer and kick around the Vikings for peterson.
It has to be paid as the season rolls along. 500k+ has to be AVAILABLE on the books for EACH week Hardy plays. It's not a "bill due at the end of the season" situation. Again, try and keep up
Nope don't have to do nothing. Vikings have no leverage and definitely are not going to pay him 13M forcing them to release him eventually.
Have no leverage? I'd say AP earning $13 mil is leverage.
So basically Stephan Jones was running things 1st half of FA and established salary cap responsibility. Jerry having mini convulsions from not making a splash finally puts his crown back on and declares his way of doing things is way more fun. Stephan back into corner with his pants pulled down. Did I get that right?
So basically Stephan Jones was running things 1st half of FA and established salary cap responsibility. Jerry having mini convulsions from not making a splash finally puts his crown back on and declares his way of doing things is way more fun. Stephan back into corner with his pants pulled down. Did I get that right?
So basically Stephan Jones was running things 1st half of FA and established salary cap responsibility. Jerry having mini convulsions from not making a slash finally put his crown back on and declares his way of doing things is way more fun. Stephan back into corner with his pants pulled down. Did I get that right?
Oh, absolutely, but I can't see Minnesota letting him go for a 7th and Peterson is on the record saying he wants his money. I don't think there's any way Peterson will sign a one-year deal and I don't think he'll play for $6M a year and modest guarantees.
Just because you have 13, doesn't mean you have to spend 13.
This is for Hardy, another signing, draft picks and keeping Carr. This not for Adrian Peterson.
So why take 13M. That makes no sense.
Not true. No one ever provided proof that this was the case. It does say it has to be "paid" as each week goes along, but it doesn't say that there has to be cap room. It actually does say that NLTBE incentives CAN be pushed to the following year. Hardy's per game bonus incentive is classified as NLTBE.
As far as the way I read it, we don't have to have the cap room for Hardy this year. If we do have available cap room when we start paying out the bonuses, those payments would deduct from whatever cap room we have available. If we reach zero cap room available, then whatever overages count against next years cap.
How that's all managed throughout the year is a different story. How much we want to have available throughout the year is the question. More importantly, how much do we want available at the end of the year.
So why take 13M. That makes no sense.
I'm gonna be disappointed when you try to tell me anything because you have no idea what you're talking about!
Jerry had to make a payment on his credit card....
Well in either case, AP is never really off the table and now Dallas has more money to use on draft day instead of after June 1st. This just opens up the draft day trade scenario's a bit more.
One thing that was mentioned was that since AP did not play last year, he could fit into a Hardy type deal with all the NLTBE incentives hitting during the year if he was open to it.
Seems like the next logical options to free up cash would be Carr post June 1st cut, Claiborne trade and Dez long term deal.
That doesn't add up. Operating at $0 in cap space during the season because of not accounting for bonus incentives is not something a professional NFL franchise would do.