silverbear;4340550 said:What you need to realize is that stupid thoughts don't get smarter just because you put them in big fonts... and if the thought being expressed isn't stupid, there's really no need to "shout"...
Getting an absolute punk on this team like DeSean Jackson should revolt you too. He is talented, but hardly worth the bother.TheCount;4340647 said:Guard should be an absolute priority, and I can see DB if an elite prospect is there when we pick. Going after a WR in Free Agency, assuming we resign Robinson, would bring my gently rolling rage to an absolute boil.
Cowboys&LakersFan;4340642 said:How is stupid to say we don't need to draft a running back?
RoyTheHammer;4340460 said:Sounds like we still don't get it..
visionary;4340730 said:you beat me to it
our GM just does not get it
on the other hand, we have been told that "all personnel decisions are from Garrett"
lets wait and see
if we dont upgrade the front 7 in FA and still go after DB in Rd 1, that will be crazy
and "go after Matt Forte"?
i cant believe that, even from jerry
Marktui;4340734 said:Forte? He is going to want big money same with Jackson. Forte, Jones, Murray at RB. Bryant, Austin, Jackson at WR. Sounds like Madden football to me. Better off drafting a power back and improving the O Line rather than spending FA money on Forte and Jackson.
This defense is going to be overhauled this next offseason. It has to be priority.
dboy214;4340455 said:took this from another (paid) website...the poster has history of posting accurate inside info about dfw/texas sports so i'll repost here.
poost;4340497 said:I think anything said about free agency and the draft at this point should be taken with a mountain of salt.
Marktui;4340734 said:This defense is going to be overhauled this next offseason. It has to be priority.
fffiasco;4340508 said:By moving Smith to LT and Free to RT, adding Nicks and drafting Decastro. Our line can become elite in one offseason if Decastro can perform right away.
Dfense94;4340846 said::laugh2:Can't help but laugh at anyone claiming to have "inside information" on a message board.