Newsflash, you are very wrong. And definitely love entitlement. Just because there are some laws (which STILL do not require a conviction) or a union doesn't change that it's entitlement.
And newsflash again. This particular union has an bargaining agreement explicitly saying that the league can do this.
And you apparently love oversimplification.
Powerful argument: I'm wrong because you said so.
BTW, feel free to post the title and section of the bargaining agreement that "explicitly" states what you just claimed. Don't skirt it; if you know it "explicitly" says that, then you should be able to point to it.
If you really think a private company can simply suspend an employee without pay for a certain period of time without valid basis or justification, then you're silly. They've got more standing terminating an at-will employee for no reason than they do to temporarily suspending without pay and no basis for doing so.