AbeBeta
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 35,708
- Reaction score
- 12,434
You are trying to state the NFL has more on this than the actual authorities do.
Again, like I asked others, point out EXACTLY what you think the NFL has. Until then, the NFL has no grounds to suspend from everything we know, from the evidence of her lying, to the authorities finding nothing.
So, please point it out. Also, understand how the league works in this regard before hopping in.
You seem to be the one lacking understanding of how the league works.
The league does not have to meet a legal standard. The league also very likely does have more information than the authorities. The league is not really bound by external pressures that a prosecuting attorney would have. If prosecution thinks, given the police report and interviews, that they aren't going to be able to win a case, they stop investigating and move on. The league doesn't need to meet a legal standard. They don't need to worry about how a jury might view the case. They don't have any of those constraints.
Also, all of you crying "but but he wasn't convicted" need to zip it. That's not the standard. A huge % of domestic violence cases never lead to prosecution (or conviction). Domestic abusers get away with it over and over and over. So let's not play the "no conviction" card. Y'all are better than that (unless you support beating women, then you aren't).