Schoonmaker starts camp on NFI list

FuzzyLumpkins said:
Exactly you were complaining about me to another poster. Your opinion was full of complaints. That is not a deduction.

It is passive aggressive though.
Click to expand...
I was agreeing with his sentiments. The last sentence you wrote is describing yourself.
 
big dog cowboy said:
It's not the company line. He wasn't taken until the final picks of the 2nd round. If he was such a hot prospect, why did he last so long?

The Cowboys draft tackles and move them guard. So in addition to not liking him, he didn't fit into their philosophical draft strategy.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Solari on draft day told the guys on the draft coverage that they are looking for "athletic" offensive linemen.
 
just stating the facts and watching for the last 29years you don't have to be a rocket scientist to know this year you bunch of knuckle heads will be the same get to the gate and have to watch from the stands. are am i wrong for the last 29 years
 
FuzzyLumpkins said:
I get you don't like me, sport.

Care to explain how I am passive aggressive? You go long on assertions and that is about it.
Click to expand...
I’m on your side…

But I have to point out that using “sport” like that is passive aggressive. Maybe you meant to be that time. Actually, I bet you did.

Good one
 
DogFace said:
I’m on your side…

But I have to point out that using “sport” like that is passive aggressive. Maybe you meant to be that time. Actually, I bet you did.

Good one
Click to expand...
Well, the poster's user name is TheSport78. Hence, you could shorten it to sport without meaning to be passive aggressive, just using their name. Know what I'm saying, dog?
 
big dog cowboy said:
It's not the company line. He wasn't taken until the final picks of the 2nd round. If he was such a hot prospect, why did he last so long?

The Cowboys draft tackles and move them guard. So in addition to not liking him, he didn't fit into their philosophical draft strategy.
Click to expand...
Although I think relying on Tyron is fool's gold if they had an eye on starting him at left tackle and moving Tyler to left guard, then it also makes sense that they would not want to use a second-round pick on a guard. Would anyone expect Torrence to beat out Tyler or Zack? Now, Torrence obviously would have given us a better backup plan for when Tyron misses games, but the more obvious need was tight end, where we were/are unsure if we had a starter to replace Schultz.

We'll see how it all turns out.
 
gimmesix said:
Although I think relying on Tyron is fool's gold if they had an eye on starting him at left tackle and moving Tyler to left guard, then it also makes sense that they would not want to use a second-round pick on a guard. Would anyone expect Torrence to beat out Tyler or Zack? Now, Torrence obviously would have given us a better backup plan for when Tyron misses games, but the more obvious need was tight end, where we were/are unsure if we had a starter to replace Schultz.

We'll see how it all turns out.
Click to expand...
No, the more obvious need was at guard. We needed a starting guard. Tyron getting injured is a certainty. Tyron should be thought of as a swing tackle that can start when he is healthy. We could have even cut Tyron if we wanted. And he certainly wont be here next season. So taking the guard was definitely the bigger need.

Steele was also hurt and he may not be here next year either.

Ferguson is ready to step in as the #1 with or without Schoon in there. Its nice to have two good TE's no doubt. But having 5 healthy quality Olineman is the most important thing to an offense.
 
CowboyRoy said:
No, the more obvious need was at guard. We needed a starting guard. Tyron getting injured is a certainty. Tyron should be thought of as a swing tackle that can start when he is healthy. We could have even cut Tyron if we wanted. And he certainly wont be here next season. So taking the guard was definitely the bigger need.

Steele was also hurt and he may not be here next year either.

Ferguson is ready to step in as the #1 with or without Schoon in there. Its nice to have two good TE's no doubt. But having 5 healthy quality Olineman is the most important thing to an offense.
Click to expand...
Torrence doesn't fit their offense.
 
he might not get healthy until midseason. Rookie tight ends rarely do much year 1 anyway. I think if he nets 200 yards and like 2-3 tds this year that will be decent . Next year is where I expect a big jump. Ferguson has looked really great thus far. As has Stephens.
 
rambo2 said:
Torrence doesn't fit their offense.
Click to expand...
LOL..............thats quite the creative blow off answer. I have to give you credit for that one. Well McGovern was one of our guards for 4 years and the Bills just signed him in the offseason. The same Bills team that drafted Torrence.

I mean, what could the Cowboys ever want with a big strong powerful guard?
 
gimmesix said:
Well, the poster's user name is TheSport78. Hence, you could shorten it to sport without meaning to be passive aggressive, just using their name. Know what I'm saying, dog?
Click to expand...
Gimme a break.

(Please, because I failed to catch that)
 
CowboyRoy said:
LOL..............thats quite the creative blow off answer. I have to give you credit for that one. Well McGovern was one of our guards for 4 years and the Bills just signed him in the offseason. The same Bills team that drafted Torrence.

I mean, what could the Cowboys ever want with a big strong powerful guard?
Click to expand...
He is too fat.
 
PackersNation said:
Flat feet is the leading cause of Plantar Fasciitus because the plantar fascia gets stretched away from the heel when bearing weight. The end.

Moving on....

Camp is going fantastic in Green Bay. Big crowds as usual, and the team is looking great. Can't wait for the first day in pads. Also looking forward to Bill Belichick and the Pats coming to TitleTown for joint practices on August 16th and 17th. Joint practices are the best practices.
Click to expand...
The only problem with the Packers is they're irrelevant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 62 more.
Total: 6,674 (members: 162, guests: 6,512)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,093
Messages
13,788,526
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top