Schultz = Witten 2.0?

[G2]

Very sound player. He needs to protect the ball and block better, but he's stepping up.

 

[BAT]

 

[BAT]

 

[CWR]

LOL..
tsk ,,tsk ..
even blake jarwin (260 lbs) is bigger than schultz who is just 244 lbs, but as ive said we have hysterical fans that are gonna make shultz into
more and imaginary than what he is.

You do realize that's a joke right? No, it actually takes more than being white and slow to be Jason Witten. Lol cmon dude.

 

[CWR]

That's a hell of a play from Dak.

 

[john van brocklin]

This dude is big and somehow gets open.. plus he can block... reminds you of anyone?

Wit had better hands

 

[Cydios]

Wit had better hands

After the Panthers game I agree.

 

[john van brocklin]

After the Panthers game I agree.

Yep

 

[CowboysExchange]

Did you really minimize Schultz accomplishments by saying one game out of 5 was against a bad team? lol You won't stop at anything to fabricate a nonsensical point will you?

You like to talk about "jump ballers" … jump balls are a tiny part of the game, and not something you need from every receiver. Hell, Kelce isn't even a "jump baller". Getting open and catching ability is infinitely more important. And really, now much better would we be with Noah Brown on that front anyway?

As for "deep ballers", again, your ignorance of actual football, and video game mindset, is showing. Other than hail mary situations offenses don't just send everyone deep. They make defenses cover multiple looks and multiple routes in multiple areas. You want the defense spread all over the field covering people to make it easier for individuals to get open. You don't want safeties able to just sit back covering deep responsibility on multiple receivers all running routes at similar depths. You really have zero understanding that it all works in sync and in a system.

As for there not being that many "every down TE's", Schultz is playing 72% of offensive snaps, not every down.

there has been a te on all but maybe about 6-7 passing plays all season.

When he isn't out there Jarwin is. Witten never came off of the field

I see alot of teams going w 4 wrs and no tes in the 2 minute drill, 3rd and Long, and on critical downs when their tes don't have deep ball or jump ball skillsets. So I guess all of those teams and coaches are ignorant. We've seen new england do it alot of times and they have how many sb and playoff wins in 25 years?

Kelce may not be a jump baller but he is a deep baller. Plus he makes game changing winning plays when it matters most.

The cowboys will win their division and we'll just see how well our tes fair in the playoffs and against good teams.

I'm betting they can't make those gamechanging and 3rd and long conversions because they never have yet. And the black n white stats say their limited in those situations.

Where are all of these gamechanging receptions and 3rd and long conversions because I haven't seen Jack Squat in 10+ years much less against a winning team.

You're theories sound great. But there are no black and white stats to support your claims. Everybody knows Pollard is more of a playmaker than Schultz. I think Wilson is too. If the game is on the line I'm going with my top skilled players and imo Schultz and Jarwin don't have gamechanging abilities regardless of what position they play

 

[OmerV]

there has been a te on all but maybe about 6-7 passing plays all season.

When he isn't out there Jarwin is. Witten never came off of the field

I see alot of teams going w 4 wrs and no tes in the 2 minute drill, 3rd and Long, and on critical downs when their tes don't have deep ball or jump ball skillsets. So I guess all of those teams and coaches are ignorant. We've seen new england do it alot of times and they have how many sb and playoff wins in 25 years?

Kelce may not be a jump baller but he is a deep baller. Plus he makes game changing winning plays when it matters most.

The cowboys will win their division and we'll just see how well our tes fair in the playoffs and against good teams.

I'm betting they can't make those gamechanging and 3rd and long conversions because they never have yet. And the black n white stats say their limited in those situations.

Where are all of these gamechanging receptions and 3rd and long conversions because I haven't seen Jack Squat in 10+ years much less against a winning team.

You're theories sound great. But there are no black and white stats to support your claims. Everybody knows Pollard is more of a playmaker than Schultz. I think Wilson is too. If the game is on the line I'm going with my top skilled players and imo Schultz and Jarwin don't have gamechanging abilities regardless of what position they play

I keep wondering about these game changing plays you talk about … you think we are going to get that from our 4th or 5th string WR? If not, where is your point? Why would you use that guy and give up all the other benefits of a TE. Well, except I know you have absolutely no concept of the role of TE, so there really isn't a point in asking that question.

I'm calling this discussion done. I can't speak reasonably with a guy who's entire knowledge of the game comes from fantasy football and video games.

 

[Rack]

I think the Schultz vs Jarwin has been put to rest now.

It's obvious even to the delusional that Schultz > Jarwin.

I like them both (minus Jarwin's blocking) and hope they continue to contribute.

 

[kskboys]

there has been a te on all but maybe about 6-7 passing plays all season.

When he isn't out there Jarwin is. Witten never came off of the field

I see alot of teams going w 4 wrs and no tes in the 2 minute drill, 3rd and Long, and on critical downs when their tes don't have deep ball or jump ball skillsets. So I guess all of those teams and coaches are ignorant. We've seen new england do it alot of times and they have how many sb and playoff wins in 25 years?

Kelce may not be a jump baller but he is a deep baller. Plus he makes game changing winning plays when it matters most.

The cowboys will win their division and we'll just see how well our tes fair in the playoffs and against good teams.

I'm betting they can't make those gamechanging and 3rd and long conversions because they never have yet. And the black n white stats say their limited in those situations.

Where are all of these gamechanging receptions and 3rd and long conversions because I haven't seen Jack Squat in 10+ years much less against a winning team.

You're theories sound great. But there are no black and white stats to support your claims. Everybody knows Pollard is more of a playmaker than Schultz. I think Wilson is too. If the game is on the line I'm going with my top skilled players and imo Schultz and Jarwin don't have gamechanging abilities regardless of what position they play

Schultz is making 1st down receptions all over the field. You are embarrassing yourself.

 

[CowboysExchange]

Schultz is making 1st down receptions all over the field. You are embarrassing yourself.

I'm not embarrassing myself. I've watched our 4-5 TD a year te core dominate passing snaps and come up short for 10 years. I've watched us get eliminated from the playoffs or exit early.

I hope Schultz does morph into a receiver who is Clutch on 3rd and Long and on Critical passing play downs and isn't the take what the Defense gives ya te that I've seen for 10 yrs. Js

 

[CowboysExchange]

I keep wondering about these game changing plays you talk about … you think we are going to get that from our 4th or 5th string WR? If not, where is your point? Why would you use that guy and give up all the other benefits of a TE. Well, except I know you have absolutely no concept of the role of TE, so there really isn't a point in asking that question.

I'm calling this discussion done. I can't speak reasonably with a guy who's entire knowledge of the game comes from fantasy football and video games.

For the last 7+ years you said the same about old man Witten and Swaim as serviceable Rogers. Youre like a broken record. Lmao.

How much success did the offense have with all of 82's and Swaims sauce at blocking because I didn't see any clutch catches, playoff wins, 3rd and long catches, game winning catches or blocks

All I saw was a a never changing predictable formation and a gassed Te core that couldn't get open or score or even block their way to a playoff birth.

Schultz is coming along better than any te that has played for us in that 7 year span. btw

But he's gonna face tougher defenses going forward and his ceiling has peaked.

It's not a video game mentally btw I'm stating the black and white stats when I say that our te core has never made a gamechanging play that propelled this team to a single win much less the playoffs.

They sneak open and produce some but when the game is on the line they fold like a cheap Suit on those 5 yard catches on 4th and 10 that come up short of the sticks and we get eliminated from playoff contention.

We also had the worst red zone offense for 7 years and it was everyone's fault besides our 4 TD a year te core. Lmao.

Schultz is not a dominant red zone target, deep baller, jump baller, scoring threat, or game changer so I'm sorry to burst your te bubble

He may be a starter but there are plenty of plays where he doesn't have the skillsets as a receiver so there is plenty of room for substitution w a better RB or WR why he goes and takes a breather on the bench same w Swaim or old man Witten

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

I think Schultz’s blocking is on par with Witten in his prime.

Witten was good blocker in the first half of his career but his blocking prowess was greatly mythologized.

 

[kskboys]

For the last 7+ years you said the same about old man Witten and Swaim as serviceable Rogers. Youre like a broken record. Lmao.

How much success did the offense have with all of 82's and Swaims sauce at blocking because I didn't see any clutch catches, playoff wins, 3rd and long catches, game winning catches or blocks

All I saw was a a never changing predictable formation and a gassed Te core that couldn't get open or score or even block their way to a playoff birth.

Schultz is coming along better than any te that has played for us in that 7 year span. btw

But he's gonna face tougher defenses going forward and his ceiling has peaked.

It's not a video game mentally btw I'm stating the black and white stats when I say that our te core has never made a gamechanging play that propelled this team to a single win much less the playoffs.

They sneak open and produce some but when the game is on the line they fold like a cheap Suit on those 5 yard catches on 4th and 10 that come up short of the sticks and we get eliminated from playoff contention.

We also had the worst red zone offense for 7 years and it was everyone's fault besides our 4 TD a year te core. Lmao.

Schultz is not a dominant red zone target, deep baller, jump baller, scoring threat, or game changer so I'm sorry to burst your te bubble

He may be a starter but there are plenty of plays where he doesn't have the skillsets as a receiver so there is plenty of room for substitution w a better RB or WR why he goes and takes a breather on the bench same w Swaim or old man Witten

Pure FF stuff. Thinking that every player needs to be a game changer is kiddie stuff.

 

[kskboys]

I think Schultz’s blocking is on par with Witten in his prime.

Witten was good blocker in the first half of his career but his blocking prowess was greatly mythologized.

I always thought so too. He was a decent blocker, not some great blow u off the ball type.

 

[Captain-Crash]

Witten in his later career was more of a pick-type blocker, he didn't blow anybody off the ball. he basically used a basketball pick to shield the defensive player from an area.

 

[mardwin]

I think the Schultz vs Jarwin has been put to rest now.

It's obvious even to the delusional that Schultz > Jarwin.

I like them both (minus Jarwin's blocking) and hope they continue to contribute.

There was never a competition. Schultz always looked more polished but a little bit green. Everything is just coming together for him.

 

[CowboysExchange]

Pure FF stuff. Thinking that every player needs to be a game changer is kiddie stuff.

You don't need a game changer on every play

But when you do need gamechanging play you're not gonna get one from a player that doesn't have those skillsets