Schultz = Witten 2.0?

Went ahead and scooped him up in my fantasy league. If Higbee doesn't produce I'm gonna give Schultz the opportunity.
 
Schultz is so good after the catch. He makes it really hard to tackle him, with both strength and shiftiness. Hard to believe, but I'd consider him a playmaker with ball in his hands
 
In order for Shultz to be compared to Witten… He must first master the 4 yard stop, drop and roll play…
its always easy to spot those that despise a player; they post the dumbest things...
 
They play nothing alike ......

Schultz is a receiver type tight end. Witten was a traditional tight end who was good at getting open 8-12 yards down field.
 
He's the closest thing we've had to Witten, but he's probably closer to late-in-his-career Witten than Hall-of Famer Witten. Not the Witten of his final two or three years, but maybe the last couple of years before that when his already limited speed started declining and he had to rely even more on his technique.
Witten was a 4.6 guy. You fell for the ol' "Looks slow so he must be slow" thingie.
 
There was no convo, the poster merely said he reminded him of Witten, that's it!!!!!!


still wittens my boy

no way hes in that debate yet. Maybe if he caught that big chunk play that got jarred out of his hands but i regress Witten got hit like that as rookie had his helmet torn off didn't he have broken jaw from it and ran 30 more yards..that's the legend of witten..he only missed one game with broken jaw and played with a wired jaw!!

Oshucks had both hands on that ball and it got knocked out..hes has work to do ti be called witten like...
 
still wittens my boy

no way hes in that debate yet. Maybe if he caught that big chunk play that got jarred out of his hands but i regress Witten got hit like that as rookie had his helmet torn off didn't he have broken jaw from it and ran 30 more yards..that's the legend of witten..he only missed one game with broken jaw and played with a wired jaw!!

Oshucks had both hands on that ball and it got knocked out..hes has work to do ti be called witten like...
It's not a debate.
 
Witten was a 4.6 guy. You fell for the ol' "Looks slow so he must be slow" thingie.

By the end of his career, he probably was around 5.0. He never was considered a fast tight end, which is what I meant. 4.6 is good speed, but there are linebackers and safeties who run 4.5 or lower, so Witten was never going to win with pure speed.
 
Back
Top