Schultz = Witten 2.0?

What Darren waller just did for the raiders is what our tes can't do

Go up and snatch a ball over the defender and score

Our flat footed checkdown tes haven't make a catch like that in over 20 years lmao

Except for Rico gathers did it that one time lol
 
Probably runs twice as fast as Witten and he isn’t tackle right before the first down marker on a third down..
 
Hes also on pace to have 13 tds but that's not gonna happen.

I would not expect that but I do think because of the outside threats we have it tends to open the middle of the field where Schultz and Jarwin can be major factors. I don't expect a 90 reception season but I do think the catches Schultz and Jarwin do make will lead to some big plays through out the season
 
What Darren waller just did for the raiders is what our tes can't do

Go up and snatch a ball over the defender and score

Our flat footed checkdown tes haven't make a catch like that in over 20 years lmao

Except for Rico gathers did it that one time lol
Kelce isn't a jump ball kind of guy either, yet he is the best TE in the game. Different players do different things well. There isn't only one formula. As for Waller, he's a damn good TE, and others can be somewhat lesser players and still be damn good TE's. Your idea about players only being worthwhile if they are cookie cutters of others is just false nonsense.
 
Once he figures out where to lineup, and when to go in motion, there will be no stopping Dalton Schultz.
 
Kelce isn't a jump ball kind of guy either, yet he is the best TE in the game. Different players do different things well. There isn't only one formula. As for Waller, he's a damn good TE, and others can be somewhat lesser players and still be damn good TE's. Your idea about players only being worthwhile if they are cookie cutters of others is just false nonsense.

I'll still take Gronk over Kelce. Especially come playoff time or the Superbowl. Kelce still makes alot of big plays and draws top defenders and coverage away from the other skilled players.

Our tes have similar skill sets but they don't have much deep passing capabilities or go up and get a ball capab
Kelce isn't a jump ball kind of guy either, yet he is the best TE in the game. Different players do different things well. There isn't only one formula. As for Waller, he's a damn good TE, and others can be somewhat lesser players and still be damn good TE's. Your idea about players only being worthwhile if they are cookie cutters of others is just false nonsense.

Yeah he's not. But he's a major weapon who draws top defenders and draws coverage away from the other skilled players and makes big plays. Plus he can play deep.

Our wrs draw all of the coverage away from our tes. They thrive on broken coverages and wide open catches. Mainly checkdown catches. They don't make many contested catches at all .

As we start having success throwing to these wide open tes defenses will start game planning around them instead of letting them wander freely.

The good playoff team defenses will shut down Schultz just like they did #82.

I'm not arguing that Schultz is not a Mediocre te. Hes just OVERINVOLVED as a receiver in too many critical passing plays and drives. Esp 3rd and long. He hasn't shown that he is clutch at even catching a contested ball nor on a game winning drive. He's caught several and much like his predecessor #82 he always Comes up Short
There is production and then there are clutch game winning players.

I'll take Gronk over Kelce any day of the week. I think he is a better te by a long shot because he wins games in every facet of his game esp as a receiver.

Defenses are only gonna give you so much. As more film comes out those limited skillets are gonna shine. Esp playing every passing snap.

Ask yourself this. If it's 3rd and goal at the 12 for the win how good do ya feel about Schultz making the play??? I'll take Pollard, Wilson, or Brown over these tes. To me that's a NoBrainer
 
Last edited:
I'll still take Gronk over Kelce. Especially come playoff time or the Superbowl. Kelce still makes alot of big plays and draws top defenders and coverage away from the other skilled players.

Our tes have similar skill sets but they don't have much deep passing capabilities or go up and get a ball capab


Yeah he's not. But he's a major weapon who draws top defenders and draws coverage away from the other skilled players and makes big plays. Plus he can play deep.

Our wrs draw all of the coverage away from our tes. They thrive on broken coverages and wide open catches. Mainly checkdown catches. They don't make many contested catches at all .

As we start having success throwing to these wide open tes defenses will start game planning around them instead of letting them wander freely.

The good playoff team defenses will shut down Schultz just like they did #82.

I'm not arguing that Schultz is not a Mediocre te. Hes just OVERINVOLVED as a receiver in too many critical passing plays and drives. Esp 3rd and long. He hasn't shown that he is clutch at even catching a contested ball nor on a game winning drive. He's caught several and much like his predecessor #82 he always Comes up Short
There is production and then there are clutch game winning players.

I'll take Gronk over Kelce any day of the week. I think he is a better te by a long shot because he wins games in every facet of his game esp as a receiver.

Defenses are only gonna give you so much. As more film comes out those limited skillets are gonna shine. Esp playing every passing snap.

Ask yourself this. If it's 3rd and goal at the 12 for the win how good do ya feel about Schultz making the play??? I'll take Pollard, Wilson, or Brown over these tes. To me that's a NoBrainer
I guess you still don't see the value of a TE not named Kelse, Gronk, Waller or Kittle. You have a very misinformed view of the game. NFL teams don't see things as you do, but who are they to say what's best, right?

So what if our TE's are helped by the team having good WR's? They are still making teams pay for it if the opponent doesn't account for every weapon on the field, and that is the point. Likewise Gronk benefits from Godwin, Brown and Evans. The point is having multiple players that can hurt the opponent if the opponent can't find a way to adequately cover all of them. It works like a charm in Tampa, and is working like a charm in Dallas.
 
I guess you still don't see the value of a TE not named Kelse, Gronk, Waller or Kittle. You have a very misinformed view of the game. So what if our TE's are helped by the team having good WR's? They are still making teams pay for it if they don't pay proper attention, and that is the point. Likewise Gronk benefits from Godwin, Brown and Evans. The point is multiple players that can hurt the opponent if the opponent can't find a way to adequately cover all of them. It works like a charm in Tampa, and is working like a charm in Dallas.

Keep in mind that this teams pedigree is playing on the turf.

You put this offense on grass and the mistakes will be enhanced.

Cooper is a great turf wr but on grass he's an avg #1 wr.

We beat the bolts. Had they not has 100 yards in penalties and they didn't take the Cook TD off the Board we prolly lose that game.

If the Schultz FUMBLE gets called correctly against the Panthers it's prolly a coin flip who wins that game.

We're gonna have to show up on grass before I start drinking any Koolaide but I do see alot of improvement in this team and with Schultz but I still don't think this offense will will go far playing this everydown te scheme.

Every week defenses are gonna make us have to beat them w our tes . We'll see how it plays out
 
Keep in mind that this teams pedigree is playing on the turf.

You put this offense on grass and the mistakes will be enhanced.

Cooper is a great turf wr but on grass he's an avg #1 wr.

We beat the bolts. Had they not has 100 yards in penalties and they didn't take the Cook TD off the Board we prolly lose that game.

If the Schultz FUMBLE gets called correctly against the Panthers it's prolly a coin flip who wins that game.

We're gonna have to show up on grass before I start drinking any Koolaide but I do see alot of improvement in this team and with Schultz but I still don't think this offense will will go far playing this everydown te scheme.

Every week defenses are gonna make us have to beat them w our tes . We'll see how it plays out
The Schultz fumble would have been a mistake - in this game.

Don't go down the path of every mistake is a pattern, and every success is a fluke. That just screams agenda while disregarding logic.
 
The Schultz fumble would have been a mistake - in this game.

Don't go down the path of every mistake is a pattern, and every success is a fluke. That just screams agenda while disregarding logic.

You've seen each wide open TD and catch by schultz with your own eyes. And you've seen the red zone and end of the game comeback fails and struggles with these tes.

Don't get too excited about the empty calorie stats is all I'm saying. I'm glad these tes are producing but clutchness and winning trumps any stats.

Sometimes we need speed, freshness, and less monotonous play calling. Not to mention Scoring ability

You gotta change up what you're doing in the NFL from week to week or defenses will figure you out.

I don't think if you put these tes tes out there w an average we core they'd be having much success
 
You've seen each wide open TD and catch by schultz with your own eyes. And you've seen the red zone and end of the game comeback fails and struggles with these tes.

Don't get too excited about the empty calorie stats is all I'm saying. I'm glad these tes are producing but clutchness and winning trumps any stats.

Sometimes we need speed, freshness, and less monotonous play calling. Not to mention Scoring ability

You gotta change up what you're doing in the NFL from week to week or defenses will figure you out.

I don't think if you put these tes tes out there w an average we core they'd be having much success
Damn impressive Schultz can find holes in defenses, and disguise and run routes that fool defenses, don't you think? lol

Oh wait, you're saying getting open is a bad trait ...

So, you think the play calling has been monotonous do you? Well, I'm thrilled with monotony if that's the case.

As for clutch and winning … why again is that only about the TE's?
 
Damn impressive Schultz can find holes in defenses, and disguise and run routes that fool defenses, don't you think? lol

Oh wait, you're saying getting open is a bad trait ...

So, you think the play calling has been monotonous do you? Well, I'm thrilled with monotony if that's the case.

As for clutch and winning … why again is that only about the TE's?
it's just as much their fault as anybody else right? They got zero winning plays in 10 years. Why do they get a free pass?
 
Schultz does not = Witten. Not even close.
Witten could block both in line and in open field, at least a little bit.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,015
Messages
14,506,764
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top