Dallasfann
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,415
- Reaction score
- 7,427
Yet win they lose YOU blame the loss totally on Dak. GTH outta here troll.
Prove that.
Yet win they lose YOU blame the loss totally on Dak. GTH outta here troll.
I'm just going by what you said and that was Dak will never win a superbowl by himself like other greats have done. I didn't make it up, that's what you said.No QB wins by themselves. Dak will never win getting paid highest in the league. Done arguing that's my view spin it anyway you want. Thanks
I'm just going by what you said and that was Dak will never win a superbowl by himself like other greats have done. I didn't make it up, that's what you said.
I said Ravens but I meant Chiefs....Chiefs were stacked last year.I said 2001 Ravens. Where a defense could carry a Dak like QB to a SB.
I said Ravens but I meant Chiefs....Chiefs were stacked last year.
This dude flip flops and writes bs but even called out her runs around the bush and changes the subject.I said Ravens but I meant Chiefs....Chiefs were stacked last year.
Careful
Be careful just accepting people's narratives as factual. Dak and the whole team suffered slow starts since Moore took over the reigns but if you look at Dak's numbers over the first three years of his career he was fine in the first half of games. MY guess is that Kellen Moore is simply not as good at scripting those first 15 - 20 plays as Redheaded Jesus is. I mean two handoffs to Pollard out of split backs to start the game? WTH was that!??!
What would your solution be?Dak is a good, solid, NFL QB who wants to be paid elite QB money. Unless he leads the Cowboys to a deep playoff run, I would let him walk after this season.
As big as every other marquee player due a contract?
Also didn’t they say he all but agreed to 35?
What does that mean? Who are his people?I'm glad you know I'm smarter than you. My place is too high up to be in the shadows. That's moreso for your people they known to be in the dumps. Yes to that last question de.
Its not "wrong to say" but it seems a bit premature to say that once we pay Dak that's it.A QB like Mahomes makes you look much more stacked then you are. If you stuck him on this team.....woooooooof.
It's actually quite comical. I'm not even calling Dak a bad QB. I've said time and time again that he could win a SB. My only argument is once we give him what he thinks he is worth then we are done. Why is that so wrong to say?
He just tried to give Mahomes credit for making Kelce and Hill looking good when they've been in the league longer than him lol.This dude flip flops and writes bs but even called out her runs around the bush and changes the subject.
Anybody saying KC doesn't have tons of weapons is ssf illy. Anybody saying Mahomes is the reason they look good is also silly, guess Mahomes is so great he makes players like Kelce great before he is even on the team.
What does that mean? Who are his people?
None of us knows what was in any contract offer...............Each side is going to present their case ; who knows what actually occurred ? I know I don't .
Haha I know right. This dude is a clownHe just tried to give Mahomes credit for making Kelce and Hill looking good when they've been in the league longer than him lol.
i'm talking about what was reported last week or so that both sides had agreed to a 5 yr 35 mil per deal at the deadline, but Dak wanted no franchise tag and Stephen said no
lol what is H word , hater?
more like R word for Realistic.
you shouldnt say dak is a bum or great after just 2 games with the new coaches.
I figure by mid season we or I should have a more realistic or informed opinion of him.