TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 83,253
- Reaction score
- 76,140
I agree.Montana and Young had HOF teammates too.
I agree.Montana and Young had HOF teammates too.
I think it's because they don't understand that winning Super Bowls takes a team, no matter how talented the QB is. But if you have a talented QB, like Staubach and Aikman, then it enhances your chances of winning them. They see a top-notch offensive line, a top running game, a top defense and assume for some reason that any QB could win with those.You have some boneheads that don’t think any of the Cowboys QBs were any good. I’ve seen fans here point to Staubach and Aikman‘s career numbers as the reason they weren’t any good.
After reading both of Jimmy's books, Jimmy Johnson wouldn't even draft nor sign Romo. Jimmy wouldn't put up with all those INTs. Now, Dak's something different. I think Jimmy would draft Dak as a backup because he brought an SEC team to the #1 CFB team in the nation. I would love to hear if from Jimmy's mouth, but he's too classy to say such things in public.What makes you believe Romo and Dak during the Cowboys 3 SBs in 4 years run could have top Aikman’s playoff performance?
10 wins 1 loss. 3 SBs. 1 SB MVP.
Passer rating of 106.3 with 2,915 yards, 21 touchdowns and 8 interceptions.
Passer rating of 111.9 in Super Bowls.
The Cowboys of the 90's had a complimentary football team. They all benefited from each other. There was nothing you could do to stop the offense, they were too balanced. And if the offense had a bad game, it did not really matter much because the defense was strong and balanced as well.The "Troy isn't good" thing goes back to the 90's. There was also a lot of "Emmitt is a product of his line and he has nothing on Sanders or Thomas" that I got thrown in my face until Super Bowl XXVII, and a few holdouts till XXVIII.
I was always amused by how much I was ragged on for being a Cowboys fan in the early 90's by those that kept on about how the Cowboys hadn't won anything in forever, and we lost 3 Championships in a row, and we'd keep doing the same thing over and over, choking. I was in High School, out f Dallas for just a few years and even my Science teacher at the time kept telling me "You all will do ok in the regular season but you can't get past 'Washington' or the Eagles, you all won't get out of the playoffs".
A few years later the same people that were hammering me about Troy sucking and Emmitt being average were wearing Cowboys jerseys and saying they knew all along.
Those clowns were posers. Do people still use that word? HahahaThe "Troy isn't good" thing goes back to the 90's. There was also a lot of "Emmitt is a product of his line and he has nothing on Sanders or Thomas" that I got thrown in my face until Super Bowl XXVII, and a few holdouts till XXVIII.
I was always amused by how much I was ragged on for being a Cowboys fan in the early 90's by those that kept on about how the Cowboys hadn't won anything in forever, and we lost 3 Championships in a row, and we'd keep doing the same thing over and over, choking. I was in High School, out f Dallas for just a few years and even my Science teacher at the time kept telling me "You all will do ok in the regular season but you can't get past 'Washington' or the Eagles, you all won't get out of the playoffs".
A few years later the same people that were hammering me about Troy sucking and Emmitt being average were wearing Cowboys jerseys and saying they knew all along.
When folks squat down and spread their cheeks over a Cowboys icon, something has to be done. HahahahaA Troy thread in 2023?
I'd put that 92 team up against any SB team including all of the Brady teams and the 85 Bears and that 92 team would probably win.The Cowboys of the 90's had a complimentary football team. They all benefited from each other. There was nothing you could do to stop the offense, they were too balanced. And if the offense had a bad game, it did not really matter much because the defense was strong and balanced as well.
Again this was all prior to the salary cap. So it is a much more difficult puzzle to put together.
Exactly my point.(key word TEAM). It is not a dig on Aikman, but trying to hold Romo to that same standard is ridiculous.I'd put that 92 team up against any SB team including all of the Brady teams and the 85 Bears and that 92 team would probably win.
The 1992 13-3 Dallas Cowboys defeated the 14-2 San Francisco 49ers in Candlestick Park in the NFC Championship game.Exactly my point.(key word TEAM). It is not a dig on Aikman, but trying to hold Romo to that same standard is ridiculous.
I like it, but I’ve never seen anyone say it. Not lately for sure.You know who you are. Troy Aikman was a legendary quarterback and he was one of the best! Enough of this bull. You youngsters have no idea what you missed with that man. He was a true Cowboy and the recent attack on his reputation is asinine. Sit down and go watch some of his highlights and how clutch he was in the postseason. Do it and your mind might be changed!
I think they do. That's kinda why I take this forum with a grain of salt. Everything old is new again.Those clowns were posers. Do people still use that word? Hahaha
I agree. I was there.The Cowboys of the 90's had a complimentary football team. They all benefited from each other. There was nothing you could do to stop the offense, they were too balanced. And if the offense had a bad game, it did not really matter much because the defense was strong and balanced as well.
Again this was all prior to the salary cap. So it is a much more difficult puzzle to put together.
That ranks in the top 25 all time.Troy Aikman had a passer rating of 88.3 with 3,849 yards, 63.7 completion %, 23 touchdowns and 17 interceptions in 16 games in the playoffs in his career.
I’m one and he wasn’t elite, he did more handing the ball to Emmitt than passing.You know who you are. Troy Aikman was a legendary quarterback and he was one of the best! Enough of this bull. You youngsters have no idea what you missed with that man. He was a true Cowboy and the recent attack on his reputation is asinine. Sit down and go watch some of his highlights and how clutch he was in the postseason. Do it and your mind might be changed!
Nah, that can't be. I've been told that Emmitt isn't even top 10 and benefited from the team around him, just like Aikman. Emmitt couldn't possibly have helped.Yes. His name is Emmitt Smith. You may have heard of him. The All Time Leading Rusher.
Again, it can't be Emmitt. We've been told for decades that he was over rated, not the GOAT or in the top 10, and only benefited from the team around him.I’m one and he wasn’t elite, he did more handing the ball to Emmitt than passing.
So he was elite at giving the ball to rb, ? I will definitely give him that, he was accurate throwing the ball to a spot, where the receivers were supposed to be, he didn’t make receivers a household name, he was a good leader, manager of the game
And here's the fallacy of pointing at an outlier to try and disprove the rule.So I'm assuming Trent Dilfer gets you all hot and bothered?
It's not hyperbole to suggest Aikman was Coach of the Year from the huddle in 1995.If you really want to know how valuable Aikmen was and how much of a "bus driver" he was go watch the Barry Switzer documentary where Aikmen pretty much coached the team to a Super Bowl win. He drove that bus to a Super Bowl with no head coach.
There was only one HOFer on that offensive line. So not the best, or top 5.That's facts. People forget the amount of talent we had around Troy Aikman. HOF talent. And probably the best offensive line ever created or at least top 5.
Stop crying.some people need to stop referring to other peoples comments as crying