Sydla
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 61,729
- Reaction score
- 95,249
That's a crap argument tho. How do you expect them to get more sacks if you want to delegate them to the bench and not trust them to get sacks when you don't wanna give them playing time to get those sacks. Tapper is a rookie and Russell basically is too so that's some weak cherry picked mess man
Except you missed the point.
The point being that right now the Cowboys will be putting 4 guys on the field to start that year that have simply have not shown whether they can or cannot rush the passer. The 2.5 sacks total is proof of that. They are complete and utter unknowns in an area that is arguably our biggest weakness - rushing the passer.
So if you can add a veteran to play alongside them, it's stunning to me that people think that's a bad idea. It's stunning to me that no one would entertain bringing in a guy who had 8 sacks in 11 games last year and wouldn't cost a whole lot of money. Worst case scenario? He sucks. And you cut him. Costs you very little, especially if you have a deal like Arizona where he had sack incentives built into his contract.