FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
- Messages
- 36,571
- Reaction score
- 27,856
I have to say that Adams post makes me feel better about the trade. Theorycrafting is one thing but an empirical basis is always preferable.
You draft the BPA, not for need.
Even I know that.
Sure there are other factors but one less top 100 player on the roster this year hurts qualitydepth just like it did in the Claiborne trade. It is horrendous risk management.
You draft the BPA, not for need.
Even I know that.
This isn't the stock market. It's football. Risk management? Bull crap. Draft the players you think can be productive for YOUR football team. Period.
Stephen Jones admitted that the over paid a tad for the Trade,If you go by actual trades made in previous drafts, not hypothetical charts, we actually got the better end of the deal by a little bit. Pick 34 is worth 800 points, and picks 47 (540 points) and 78 (230 points) are worth a combined 770 points.
http://adamjt13.blogspot.com/2012/04/trade-fitted-draft-value-chart.html
There are many examples in recent years showing that moving up 13 spots in that part of the draft costs at least what we gave up. In 2007, for example, the Bills traded up from 43 (four spots higher than us) to 34 (same pick we got) and gave up the 74th pick (also four spots higher) to do it. They paid more to move up less for the same pick. And there are many examples of a fourth rounder, such as our 119th pick, being enough to move up only about half as far as we did.
http://adamjt13.blogspot.com/2012/04/history-of-trading-up-in-nfl-draft.html
The only way we could have gotten the 34th pick for our second- and fourth-round picks -- or gotten a pick back from Washington -- was if the Commanders had been willing to accept less than what many other teams have gotten in recent years.
Stephen Jones admitted that the over paid a tad for the Trade,
Did he? That would be mighty interesting.
A point system has emerged because it's always nice to quantify anything that is subject to comparison because it makes it much easier. However, there is no denying that if Demarcus Lawrence turns out to be a stud pass rusher, we got him cheap, with the not inconsiderable bonus of the Commanders having helped facilitate the acquisition. If he is a flop, we gave too much.
Stephen Jones admitted that the over paid a tad for the Trade,
I need to quickly search the net for a picture of that Captain Obvious character on the hotel commercials.
I need to quickly search the net for a picture of that Captain Obvious character on the hotel commercials.
If you go by actual trades made in previous drafts, not hypothetical charts, we actually got the better end of the deal by a little bit. Pick 34 is worth 800 points, and picks 47 (540 points) and 78 (230 points) are worth a combined 770 points.
http://adamjt13.blogspot.com/2012/04/trade-fitted-draft-value-chart.html
There are many examples in recent years showing that moving up 13 spots in that part of the draft costs at least what we gave up. In 2007, for example, the Bills traded up from 43 (four spots higher than us) to 34 (same pick we got) and gave up the 74th pick (also four spots higher) to do it. They paid more to move up less for the same pick. And there are many examples of a fourth rounder, such as our 119th pick, being enough to move up only about half as far as we did.
http://adamjt13.blogspot.com/2012/04/history-of-trading-up-in-nfl-draft.html
The only way we could have gotten the 34th pick for our second- and fourth-round picks -- or gotten a pick back from Washington -- was if the Commanders had been willing to accept less than what many other teams have gotten in recent years.
Same with Will McClay.....unimpressed with the way things went....unable to maneuver the draft, things fell badly and the Cowboys acted unprepared...panic set in......McClay and the Jones' got schooled by real NFL FO's......
Stephen Jones said:“He was the last guy we really had in terms of the right-end spot,” Stephen Jones said. “We knew we might have to give up a little more than maybe the charts read out. That happens sometimes when you want a guy and we really wanted this guy. We didn’t want to lose him. We worked through the deal. We sweetened the pot a little bit and got the deal done.”
Real front offices? You mean the one that gave up 3 firsts and a second for RGIII? The one that took the picks they got from us and took Murphy and Long? We were in a bidding war with Atlanta for a player we very much wanted and needed, so the price was driven up. I don't like giving up a 3rd either, and time will tell if it was a smart move, but judging the FO based on a very limited perspective is just that...limited. There's always more to the story.