DallasGirl50;3977538 said:
Watched it & heard what he said...makes no sense unless it's just storyline to put a wrestler in a title match when he's leaving...and particularly in a match where you have to pay...there is no chance he would take that belt with him.
Exactly.. Punk v. Cena was rumored to be a feud they would run with this summer, Punk is leaving so they will hype up the match with Punk saying he will leave with the title. He won't but it will boost the buy rates and then he will leave, as predicted by everyone and their mothers, except for Zrinkill.
I could see a finish where Punk his the GTS, Cena is out for the count but then a WWE Legend, Stone Cold, comes out and knocks out the ref so Punk can't leave with the title, stuns Punk and then a new ref comes and 1-2-3 Cena defends, Punk leaves saying he was screwed & whenever he returns you got the rumored Punk-Austin feud setup, you make Austin relevant to new fans as they say he is the man who saved the WWE title & have one hell of a PPV finish.
Another possibility since it is MITB is Punk wins against Cena, and then gets cashed in on and loses, he cashed in a few years ago on an injured edge? to capture his title the first time, so it is an interesting dynamic to think about, and in this scenario you can have Punk pop the buyrate, pop the Raw rating and make a star on the way out PLUS it create's good will with Punk as you give him a farewell title reign, no matter how short. This is what they should do, IMO.