Talking Cowboys video breakdown

[Dre11]

No, Irvin and Olson both said the mid field INT was the fault of CeeDee.

Yep. So did McCarthy

 

[America's Cowboy]

Watching to yesterdays Talking Cowboys Show, Isaiah Stanback broke down Daks interception to CeeDee. He says the Cowboy offense has become predictable and teams know which routes CeeDee is running which has resulted in two interception two weeks in a row on the same play. This is causing team to show one look pre-snap but jumping into another look once the ball is snapped. This is confusing Dak and causing him to throw the ball right into the defense the last two weeks. He clear states Dak is at fault. You can start watching at 24:20 mark here Talkin' Cowboys: Butterfly Effect (dallascowboys.com)

Isaiah Stanbach and all of you Dak haters are absolutely wrong. Regardless if the opponent has figured out certain pass plays ran by the Cowboys, it is CeeDee's responsibility (and any other receivers #1 responsibility) to always run the route called and make sure to cross inside any Safety/DB, even if you're going to get hit. You always have to position yourself between the DB and your QB, use your body as a shield and attack the ball. Michael Irvin, Greg Olson, Keyshawn Johnson, Jimmy Johnson, Nate Newton, Everson Walls, Coach Mike McCarthy, etc all said the same. For Isaiah Stanbach to say otherwise PROVES why he stunk as a receiver (52 career receiving yards in 4 years for 3 different teams). Absolutely stunk because he didn't know then just like he doesn't know now what he's talking about.

 

[DalFan75]

O was just as responsible handing them 14 pts. and of course stinking it up in money time.

The offense didnt hand them 14 pts.

The offense did score 28 pts, which should be more than enough to beat a lousy offensive team averaging 17 a game and coming in on a 5 game losing streak.

Or maybe you are one of the geniuses that believes our offense is only good if they score every time they have the ball.

 

[Cboyfan4ever]

Bull!

If you can't score in the 4th qtr...when we need it the most, against a not very good team

...then you ain't ship. Pathetic. Terrible all the way around. Offense included.

We can never score in money time w/ our current QB.Been like that for years.Sally arm CR is better when it really counts than the 40 million dollar man.

 

[Dre11]

Isaiah Stanbach and all of you Dak haters are absolutely wrong. Regardless if the opponent has figured out certain pass plays ran by the Cowboys, it is CeeDee's responsibility (and any other receivers #1 responsibility) to always run the route called and make sure to cross inside any Safety/DB, even if you're going to get hit. You always have to position yourself between the DB and your QB, use your body as a shield and attack the ball. Michael Irvin, Greg Olson, Keyshawn Johnson, Jimmy Johnson, Nate Newton, Everson Walls, Coach Mike McCarthy, etc all said the same. For Isaiah Stanbach to say otherwise PROVES why he stunk as a receiver (52 career receiving yards in 4 years for 3 different teams). Absolutely stunk because he didn't know then just like he doesn't know now what he's talking about.

I wouldn't say Isaiah is wrong, he says Dak made the right read. He's just saying Ceedee made the decision because GB disguised their coverage well and confused ceedee

 

[Cboyfan4ever]

The offense didnt hand them 14 pts.

The offense did score 28 pts, which should be more than enough to beat a lousy offensive team averaging 17 a game and coming in on a 5 game losing streak.

Or maybe you are one of the geniuses that believes our offense is only good if they score every time they have the ball.

But, like always, when we have to score,we can’t.Those two picks led to 14 pts. moron.But, no, that had nothing to do w/ the loss.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

The offense didnt hand them 14 pts.

The offense did score 28 pts, which should be more than enough to beat a lousy offensive team averaging 17 a game and coming in on a 5 game losing streak.

Or maybe you are one of the geniuses that believes our offense is only good if they score every time they have the ball.

So who said we have to score every time "they"..."we"? are you a fan?....have the ball?

Nobody.

You show me who said that I leave the forum

You can't show me who said that YOU leave for being a flat liar troll.

 

[DalFan75]

But, like always, when we have to score,we can’t.Those two picks led to 14 pts. moron.But, no, that had nothing to do w/ the loss.

TWO TOUCHDOWN LEAD IN 4TH QUARTER AGAINST BAD FOOTBALL TEAM.

As for your other comment. The one pick and return gave GB a short field. The other one they covered 67 yds and threw a bomb for a TD.

We were down 14-7 after the 2nd one, we scored 21 unanswered points. Good defensive teams don't blow two td leads against bad teams in the 4th qtr.

This is supposed to be a very good (and the word elite has been thrown around all season) defense. They sure have not played that way the last two games. They lost the Green Bay game, period.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

I wouldn't say Isaiah is wrong, he says Dak made the right read. He's just saying Ceedee made the decision because GB disguised their coverage well and confused ceedee

And dak is NEVER confused at the coverage?

Shouldnt'; the QB read the defense AND is WR? Shouldn't there be a mental acuity and connection there what the both see?

I am not saying this has to happen "every time "THEY" touch the ball". Maybe these two don't have a connection...I dunno.

 

[Dre11]

And dak is NEVER confused at the coverage?

Shouldnt'; the QB read the defense AND is WR? Shouldn't there be a mental acuity and connection there what the both see?

I am not saying this has to happen "every time "THEY" touch the ball". Maybe these two don't have a connection...I dunno.

Who said Dak is never confused by coverage? This is about what happened on the two ints

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

TWO TOUCHDOWN LEAD IN 4TH QUARTER AGAINST BAD FOOTBALL TEAM.

As for your other comment. The one pick and return gave GB a short field. The other one they covered 67 yds and threw a bomb for a TD.

We were down 14-7 after the 2nd one, we scored 21 unanswered points. Good defensive teams don't blow two td leads against bad teams in the 4th qtr.

This is supposed to be a very good (and the word elite has been thrown around all season) defense. They sure have not played that way the last two games. They lost the Green Bay game, period.

So we couldn;t score ANY points...against what you claim is a BAD TEAM...in the 4th qtr...when we really needed a score and shave precious time off the clock.

WOW....we must be even a badder team than they are if we can't do that.

When CAN we win in the 4th qtr? Against a GOOD team?

 

[Cboyfan4ever]

TWO TOUCHDOWN LEAD IN 4TH QUARTER AGAINST BAD FOOTBALL TEAM.

As for your other comment. The one pick and return gave GB a short field. The other one they covered 67 yds and threw a bomb for a TD.

We were down 14-7 after the 2nd one, we scored 21 unanswered points. Good defensive teams don't blow two td leads against bad teams in the 4th qtr.

This is supposed to be a very good (and the word elite has been thrown around all season) defense. They sure have not played that way the last two games. They lost the Green Bay game, period.

I agree, but 1st pick took pts off the board.Red zone to’s are killers.Both units should be held accountable.D has pretty much carried team all year, but not vs. GB.But, just once I’d like O to come thru when it really matters.Haven’t done so in a long time w/ current QB.

 

[DalFan75]

So who said we have to score every time "they"..."we"? are you a fan?....have the ball?

Nobody.

You show me who said that I leave the forum

You can't show me who said that YOU leave for being a flat liar troll.

The offense got them 28 pts dude. How many do you think they should score against bad teams offensive teams to win games?

The guy said the offense stunk in money time. But the offense did get them 28 pts and a 2 td lead. The offense was not perfect but did score 28 pts, did get over 420 yds of total offense, did rush for nearly 160 yds and had 24 first downs. That should be enough to win games against teams that come in averaging 17 pts a game.

When the offense stinks up the joint I have no problem pointing the finger at them, but apparently its painful for some in this forum to accept that the defense (which they believed was elite) played bad and lost the game.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Who said Dak is never confused by coverage? This is about what happened on the two ints

Okay fine. So....When is Dak confused? Can you point to game or play? I guess I need your parameters on who gets the blame for confusion.

 

[DalFan75]

I agree, but 1st pick took pts off the board.Red zone to’s are killers.Both units should be held accountable.D has pretty much carried team all year, but not vs. GB.But, just once I’d like O to come thru when it really matters.Haven’t done so in a long time w/ current QB.

The D clearly didnt carry the team vs the Bears either.

The offense did what it needed to do for the most part this week. 28 pts should be plenty vs a team that averages 17.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

The offense got them 28 pts dude. How many do you think they should score against bad teams offensive teams to win games?

The guy said the offense stunk in money time. But the offense did get them 28 pts and a 2 td lead. The offense was not perfect but did score 28 pts, did get over 420 yds of total offense, did rush for nearly 160 yds and had 24 first downs. That should be enough to win games against teams that come in averaging 17 pts a game.

When the offense stinks up the joint I have no problem pointing the finger at them, but apparently its painful for some in this forum to accept that the defense (which they believed was elite) played bad and lost the game.

We simply MUST be able to march down there and score in the 4th qtr and won the game., Like Rodgers and Brady do to us.

When do we do that? Against a BETTER team then Green Bay?

YEs the defense gave up 14. When do we make THEIR defense give up points for a win.

Dak did it 5 times in 2016. And 5 times since then.

 

[glimmerman]

Mike McCarthy saw it too

Sad thing is if Dak looks to his left the corner let the WR go and safety was way off. Easy pitch and catch at the bottom. That entire defense knew where he was going with the ball.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

The D clearly didnt carry the team vs the Bears either.

The offense did what it needed to do for the most part this week. 28 pts should be plenty vs a team that averages 17.

So when does the killer instict come in? When do we strike back....

You KEEP vaunting our SUPERB offense that van put up 28 points. But when can we do it when the game is on the line? WHen we NEED it most. Like Rodgers did to us? With his already mentioned crappy team?

When?

 

[DalFan75]

So we couldn;t score ANY points...against what you claim is a BAD TEAM...in the 4th qtr...when we really needed a score and shave precious time off the clock.

WOW....we must be even a badder team than they are if we can't do that.

When CAN we win in the 4th qtr? Against a GOOD team?

28 pts dude...vs a team averaging 17

 

[starfan1]

What's shocking is people still not understanding basic football.

YOUR DEFENSE GOT SHREDDED BY A BAD OFFENSIVE TEAM.

YOUR DEFENSE GAVE UP 31 PTS TO A BAD OFFENSIVE TEAM.

YOUR DEFENSE GAVE UP 200+ RUSHING YARDS TO A BAD OFFENSIVE TEAM.

YOUR DEFENSE HAD A TWO TD LEAD IN THE FORTH QUARTER AND BLEW IT.

THE OFFENSE SCORED 28 POINTS AGAINST A TEAM AVERAGING 17.

People are dug in and see whatever confirms their narrative