Clarkson
Wonderboyromo
- Messages
- 2,677
- Reaction score
- 1,599
51st in sacks, not that it matters I guess.
do you not notice all aspects of his game? how he is fantastic all over the field?
51st in sacks, not that it matters I guess.
I made no mistake, I simply posted my opinion on it. Funny, people the likes of you don't see the total *** backwards and insane acceptance of "entertainers" being paid like kings for what exactly? If you had actually read my post, you would have seen how I view these so called entertainers. They contribute ZERO to elevating the economy in such they do not produce a damn thing that makes our country stronger, stable or house people, make it so you can gas up your trucks, cars, light your home, build roads to drive said vehicles on, clothing, food ETC... you get the picture. And again, if you had actually read my post, you would have read this line "But hey, he got his payday, do with it as he will, no sweat off my brow...wth does that have to do with Tom hanks or anyone for that matter? As for their bo bo's they collect as they "play" a game to entertain us, they should spend 30 years in the oil fields, or hanging iron for buildings, maybe a doctor or nurse working with high risk people, IE ebola, Aids, et al these people risk nothing, and add nothing to the overall economy. You have you view of how grand they all are, and I have mine...lets leave it right there.
I've built multiple businesses. I assure you that's not true.
Its safer for someone like you to make assumptions about how someone else thinks than it is to ask them.I made no mistake, I simply posted my opinion on it. Funny, people the likes of you don't see the total *** backwards and insane acceptance of "entertainers" being paid like kings for what exactly? If you had actually read my post, you would have seen how I view these so called entertainers. They contribute ZERO to elevating the economy in such they do not produce a damn thing that makes our country stronger, stable or house people, make it so you can gas up your trucks, cars, light your home, build roads to drive said vehicles on, clothing, food ETC... you get the picture. And again, if you had actually read my post, you would have read this line "But hey, he got his payday, do with it as he will, no sweat off my brow...wth does that have to do with Tom hanks or anyone for that matter? As for their bo bo's they collect as they "play" a game to entertain us, they should spend 30 years in the oil fields, or hanging iron for buildings, maybe a doctor or nurse working with high risk people, IE ebola, Aids, et al these people risk nothing, and add nothing to the overall economy. You have you view of how grand they all are, and I have mine...lets leave it right there.
Yep....Guns and Butter theorylost 60k value driving it off the lot
all players areI'm saying he's always been about the money- even before he got his money. But I get what you're saying
capitalism only works when people are spending money.welcome to capitalism.
they bring in more revenue than a social worker and get paid for it.
do they add more societal value than other important jobs? nope.
but they generate far, FAR more money. and that's all that matters today.
thats why I liked alfred morris, he drove a used car he fixed up, and put his money in the bank.
He also pal around with all the stadium employees. very down to earth, and smart guy.
if it were me, I wouldnt buy a fancy car, I would just have a limo service drive me everywhere.
Are you serious? That's not just a"nice car".I see what you're saying, but the reality is that most wealthy men (in any profession) buy nice cars.
No sense in getting bent out of shape about it.
It's a luxury vehicle, what do you want me to say? The CEO of my company drives a car probably just as expensive, and he's probably worth half what DLaw is.Are you serious? That's not just a"nice car".
He's no longer a serious football player. He is one of JJ's kept men.It's a luxury vehicle, what do you want me to say? The CEO of my company drives a car probably just as expensive, and he's probably worth half what DLaw is.
People with money buy things because they can.
It's a luxury vehicle, what do you want me to say? The CEO of my company drives a car probably just as expensive, and he's probably worth half what DLaw is.
People with money buy things because they can.
This is your opinion and your entitled to it, but history says that that is not even remotely true about any of them.
You're welcome. A lot of people say if they desired something they would have it. Ime damn near none of those people have the means to ever get whatever it is that they could get if they "desired" it so again its sounds good talk.Lol... thank you for your qualifier.
If I desired a car like that, I would have one.
A mclaren 720sAgreed, if it was only money their total performance would drop off dramatically, and Tank as noted still plays at a high level.
Besides, if he continues to play at a high level, he's probably got performance bonuses in his contract, and if he stays healthy he's in line for an even bigger contract.
This is a non-story imho, what would any of us do if we got like a 500% raise?
Buy something expensive and exclusive, within budget of course.
By the way, I can't see the original post photo, what'd he buy?
Except D-Law. Nothing nice about that thing.I see what you're saying, but the reality is that most wealthy men (in any profession) buy nice cars.
No sense in getting bent out of shape about it.
It's a luxury vehicle, what do you want me to say? The CEO of my company drives a car probably just as expensive, and he's probably worth half what DLaw is.
People with money buy things because they can.
A mclaren 720s