TE Campbell to miss a week.

[big dog cowboy]

Another perfectly good thread hijacked.

 

[big dog cowboy]

He actually had surgery last night from what I understand and will be out 2 weeks.

Better now than during the season.

 

[dargonking999]

Not my fault

 

[big dog cowboy]

Canty to TE situationally. Gotta be prepared and ready for injuries. You heard it here first.

Actually, didn't we have this discussion once or twice already this offseason? :bang2:

 

[big dog cowboy]

Campbell back in 10 days, Aug. 7th.

Parcells said Canty is expected to begin full practice, Aug. 8th.

Just when is Canty going to get those 2nd team reps?

:laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:

 

[LaTunaNostra]

BS
EVERYONE "KNOWS IT NOW" Two years ago, a year ago, 6 months ago and today majority still fight the 3-4 reality. Go 2 years back and do a hybrid or 3-4 search. You are 100% wrong on your assertion.

My track record historically is pretty good on predictions globally actually. Grow a pair and post yours?

Bawhahahahah!!!

"Global predictions"...."historically"... there is an air of significance here I can't quite grasp. Not exactly Churchill forecasting German intentions.

No, Nors, it doesn't take a "pair" to predict a pragmatic coach who played a 3-4 his entire career might just do the same if his current defense failed. And I know Cowboys fans were expecting 3-4 when Bill was first hired.

That you decided (or your mania decided for you) that you would make it into a two year crusade is actually, well, a bit odd.

Also keep in mind a certain percentage of the '4-3 homerism' emanantes from legitimate belief the talent on board is still more 4-3 suitable, some comes out of the historical Cowboys perspective/practice (Landry, etc), and yet more is a reaction to YOUR obsessive pursuit of it.

I think the 4-3ites are going to handle MIXED fronts a lot better than you are.

And if Bill, as he flat out said today, has to fall back on the 4-3 exclusively, I hope folks are more charitable about not rubbing it in than you have been.

 

[Waffle]

Dude - I can get past your heinous spelling issues. But dude - have you read my posts factually explaining to you Canty played TE at UVA?

HELLO?

So what? Ebenezer Ekuban played TE in college too, but I didn't see Parcells trotting his *** out on the field in place of Witten, Campbell, or Robinson.

 

[Waffle]

And if Bill, as he flat out said today, has to fall back on the 4-3 exclusively, I hope folks are more charitable about not rubbing it in than you have been.

That was the key thing he said today, B. I predicted this very thing two weeks ago...that if the players did not pick up the 3-4 scheme to Bill's liking, he'd fall back on the 4-3 and maybe run some "mixed" fronts instead.

 

[big dog cowboy]

if the players did not pick up the 3-4 scheme to Bill's liking, he'd fall back on the 4-3 and maybe run some "mixed" fronts instead.

 

[Nors]

So what? Ebenezer Ekuban played TE in college too, but I didn't see Parcells trotting his *** out on the field in place of Witten, Campbell, or Robinson.

Ekubust was Ekubust. When did Campbell play with Ekuban?

 

[Nors]

That was the key thing he said today, B. I predicted this very thing two weeks ago...that if the players did not pick up the 3-4 scheme to Bill's liking, he'd fall back on the 4-3 and maybe run some "mixed" fronts instead.

Good thing you are not managing this team. You would let the inmates run the asylum? Parcells drafted 3-4, grilled Zimmer and will not accept your malaise and acceptance of failure.

 

[Hostile]

That's become clear.

It's the Peter Principle in living color.

 

[Nors]

Bawhahahahah!!!

"Global predictions"...."historically"... there is an air of significance here I can't quite grasp. Not exactly Churchill forecasting German intentions.

No, Nors, it doesn't take a "pair" to predict a pragmatic coach who played a 3-4 his entire career might just do the same if his current defense failed. And I know Cowboys fans were expecting 3-4 when Bill was first hired.

That you decided (or your mania decided for you) that you would make it into a two year crusade is actually, well, a bit odd.

Also keep in mind a certain percentage of the '4-3 homerism' emanantes from legitimate belief the talent on board is still more 4-3 suitable, some comes out of the historical Cowboys perspective/practice (Landry, etc), and yet more is a reaction to YOUR obsessive pursuit of it.

I think the 4-3ites are going to handle MIXED fronts a lot better than you are.

And if Bill, as he flat out said today, has to fall back on the 4-3 exclusively, I hope folks are more charitable about not rubbing it in than you have been.

Whatever you say. There were few to none calling 3-4, hybrids and all that we are BECOMING today 2 years ago - to this day there is an element that still don't get that!!!!! In fact there was public redicule towards 3-4 slants. Go back to Howard trade threads 4 months ago there was SERIOUS resistance to 3-4. And TODAY.

Ya'll are in spin mode and denial. But yes, it was OBVIOUS what Parcells would do with 3-4 and today I agree with you 10000%!!!

Goodnight.

 

[BigDFan5]

.....

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Good thing you are not managing this team. You would let the inmates run the asylum? Parcells drafted 3-4, grilled Zimmer and will not accept your malaise and acceptance of failure.

How is evaluating whether or not the players can perform letting them run the asylum?

If Ellis for example is getting killed against the run for example you think Parcells is just going to allow that? Especially if there is an alternative?

Come on man are you a fan of the 3-4 or the Dallas Cowboys?

 

[Nors]

It's the Peter Principle in living color.

Thats wrong hombre -

And in fact so far wrong....
I'm very secure and succesfull at what I do , feel no need to slander you as you just did me. Man thats weak....

 

[LaTunaNostra]

Whatever you say. There were few to none calling 3-4, hybrids and all that we are BECOMING today 2 years ago - to this day there is an element that still don't get that!!!!! In fact there was public redicule towards 3-4 slants. Go back to Howard trade threads 4 months ago there was SERIOUS resistance to 3-4. And TODAY.

Ya'll are in spin mode and denial. But yes, it was OBVIOUS what Parcells would do with 3-4 and today I agree with you 10000%!!!

Goodnight.

If only they gave out medals, Nors, for sports board predictions.

You'd be a five star general.

 

[LaTunaNostra]

.....

I wish I had a pic of TO photoshopped into that one.

 

[Nors]

How is evaluating whether or not the players can perform letting them run the asylum?

If Ellis for example is getting killed against the run for example you think Parcells is just going to allow that? Especially if there is an alternative?

Come on man are you a fan of the 3-4 or the Dallas Cowboys?

Parcells already said Ellis reps will be down 20%
He has won at age 30 for Dalls? NOTHING

Spears, Canty, Ratliff, Coleman - We don't need an aging whining undersized DE asking what his role is.....

 

[Hostile]

Thats wrong hombre -

And in fact so far wrong....
I'm very secure and succesfull at what I do , feel no need to slander you as you just did me. Man thats weak....

slan·der ([font=verdana,sans-serif] P [/font]) Pronunciation Key (sl

n

d

r)
n.

1. Law. Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation.
2. A false and malicious statement or report about someone.

v. slan·dered, slan·der·ing, slan·ders
v. tr. To utter a slander about. See Synonyms at malign.
v. intr. To utter or spread slander.







Uh, it's not slander.