scottsp;1371006 said:Yeah, numbers aren't the truest measure of performance. If that were the case, guys like Art Monk would have been in long ago. And, IMO, Owens' impact hasn't matched up to the stats he's put up throughout his career.
It's next to impossible for a wideout to go in on the first ballot, unless you're talking about Jerry Rice. Not many make it the first time out.
He won't make the first ballot. Probably not the first two or three.
slick325;1371013 said:Actually I think Cris Carter is gonna make it next season on his 1st go round. Marvin Harrison too once he's eligible.
scottsp;1371020 said:Ya know, allow me to backtrack on that "next to impossible" statement. I think you're right on that. Those two guys do have a good shot at getting in right out of the box. There may be someone else like maybe Tim Brown.
ologan;1370836 said:HOF Receivers-
Player Years Receptions Yards TD's
Alworth 11 542 10266 85
Berry 13 631 9275 68
Biletnikof 14 589 8974 76
Fears 9 400 5397 38
Hirsch 9 343 6299 53
Irvin 12 750 11904 65
Joiner 19(wow!) 750 12146 65
Largent 14 819 13089 100
Lavelli 7 244 3908 33
Lofton 17 764 14004 75
Maynard 15 633 11834 88
McDonald 12 495 8410 84
Mitchell 11 521 7954 65
Pihos 9 373 5619 61
Stallworth 14 537 8723 63
Swann 9 336 5462 51
Taylor 13 649 9110 79
Warfield 13 427 8565 85
_________________________________________________
"Ocho Uno" 11 801 11715 114
ologan;1370767 said:When TO retires,does he make the HOF on the first ballot when eligible? If not,why not?
Nah, not because of being a Cowboy, if that was the case we wouldn't have any Cowboys in the HOF. But I do agree with you that TO won't get in because he is TO and he has only himself blame for that.AMERICAS_FAN;1371243 said:They'll never vote him in because he's T.O. on top of being a Dallas Cowboy.
I would say "no", if his career ended today. If he's going to be a first-ballot HOF, he needs a few more seasons of 10+ touchdowns, and at least one Superbowl ring.ologan;1370767 said:When TO retires,does he make the HOF on the first ballot when eligible? If not,why not?
ThreeSportStar80;1371325 said:Keep in mind T.O. NEVER has gotten into any off the field trouble and IF he wins a Superbowl here in Dallas then you would have to consider him for a first ballot. The numbers will be there for his career stats.
TruBlueCowboy;1370877 said:Yeah, but then look at today's receivers. There are a lot of wideouts who put up big numbers these days, especially when compared to previous decades.
If TO puts up 2 more Pro Bowl caliber seasons (I would consider this one), I think he has a shot, but fair or not, the voters will hold his crazy antics, lack of playing for one team a majority of his career, and failure to show up big in big games against him.
tecolote;1371409 said:The hall of fame is not all about numbers, Art Monk is the perfect example, obviously Owens has the numbers, but he also has this, he has probably been the best WR in the game for the past 10 years and he has been close to being the best PLAYER in the league.
Off the field he is an obnoxious nutt, but on the field he has been nothing but brilliant. After Jerry Rice he is in my opinion the best WR to ever play the game.
Jarv;1374520 said:The bolded part is so true, what is Swann and Stallworth doing there, because they won championships. I personally don't think rings should be part of the equation in a team sport, but that is just my opinion.
WV Cowboy;1374525 said:If criminal activity does not keep a man out of the HOF, why would stupid stuff they say keep them out ?
bbgun;1374521 said:Well, Monk's got three of them, so that can't be what's holding him out.