Fritsch_the_cat
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,749
- Reaction score
- 4,138
I have been pro-Charlie Strong but if this keeps up he won't be around much longer. It won't all be his fault, but that's how things work.
I have been pro-Charlie Strong but if this keeps up he won't be around much longer. It won't all be his fault, but that's how things work.
Oklahoma is going to smoke Texas. That's sad. And what's with all the in-fighting with the Texas players? The players may have felt some entitlement before Strong, but at least they loved playing for Mack Brown.
This is just disgraceful of late.
Texas may not win another game this season. People can defend Strong all they want but this team is worse than last season.
Texas may not win another game this season. People can defend Strong all they want but this team is worse than last season.
It really is difficult to defend the product we're seeing on the field. And the embarrassment that follows is new for each player, fan, and most of the coaches. None of us think we have to put up with this.........this is UT, for Christ's sake! (there is some dispute that Christ actually was a Longhorn)
Mack's ship began to lose its rudder while Vince young was there, because the looseness that VY embodied still led to success, largely due to his amazing fit in the read option. He and his buds just did their thing, made practice fun, and attracted a lot of the same type of recruits -- the kind that may have had an air of entitlement and and subpar work ethic on the field and in the classroom.
If truth be told, I'd bet Strong wouldn't have taken the job if he realized how pervasive the disease was that turned Longhorns into fat lazy cows.
If he'd been able to accurately assess how many players would need to be booted out, and had seen what little was left over, he probably would have declined the offer. If he did know the depths of the problems and came anyway, then he deserves all my respect for tackling so much dysfunction.
Regardless, firing him won't change our personnel. We have a freshman team that makes mistakes. there is no quick fix, but we should go from 4-8 to 7-5 to 9-3 by 2017. I know, that's optimistic, but that just how I look at it. I've also heard that patience is a virtue.
Just now finding this thread. I have been in the give Strong time camp for a while.... but that is starting to go away because there are NO SIGNS of improvement along the way. If the FLUKE special teams gaffes had not occurred there's a chance we would have 3 wins.... so I had to give him the benefit of the doubt. I still am not sure I'm ready to can him. I'm just CONFUSED. I didn't read the other 6 pages of this thread so.... as Cowboys fans.... what do you think about the possibility of Chip Kelly. I do NOT want him. Maybe it's my Cowboys bias/Eagles hate but I don't. I don't know who else is out there which is why I'm willing to see how this season shakes out with Charlie... thoughts?
I don't want his fast-paced, gimmicky, trick offense. He pays no attention to defense. It's all finesse offense for Chip, and everything else seemingly takes a back seat. That, and I don't want to see the Longhorns wearing 12 different uniform combinations.
It really is difficult to defend the product we're seeing on the field. And the embarrassment that follows is new for each player, fan, and most of the coaches. None of us think we have to put up with this.........this is UT, for Christ's sake! (there is some dispute that Christ actually was a Longhorn)
Mack's ship began to lose its rudder while Vince young was there, because the looseness that VY embodied still led to success, largely due to his amazing fit in the read option. He and his buds just did their thing, made practice fun, and attracted a lot of the same type of recruits -- the kind that may have had an air of entitlement and and subpar work ethic on the field and in the classroom.
If truth be told, I'd bet Strong wouldn't have taken the job if he realized how pervasive the disease was that turned Longhorns into fat lazy cows.
If he'd been able to accurately assess how many players would need to be booted out, and had seen what little was left over, he probably would have declined the offer. If he did know the depths of the problems and came anyway, then he deserves all my respect for tackling so much dysfunction.
Regardless, firing him won't change our personnel. We have a freshman team that makes mistakes. There is no quick fix, but we should go from 4-8 to 7-5 to 9-3 by 2017. I know, that's optimistic, but that's just how I look at it. I've also heard that patience is a virtue.
DITTO
On Hornfans.com where I lurk and sometimes post I'm the ONLY one who doesn't want him and exactly because of his offense. Even if he were still at Oregon and never coached the Fecals, I can't stand his offense.
Don't know what to tell you other than I will gladly take Mack way including 2 trips to the National Championship and 1 win over what I am seeing from Strong. I still contend top programs turnaround do not take as long as I have seen teams come off suspension with very limited recruiting play better than this. This season could end up a 1 win season over Rice and people can say what they want on mack but none of his team ever played like this crap I am seeing from Strongs team. Sooner he is out of here the better
I remember seeing Mack Brown teams getting blown out badly by OU. They most definitely played like crap in those games. Games where you could see DBs give up on tackles. I recall a Brown team playing against NCSU in 1999 that had a few punts blocked, which cost them the game. They were so poorly coached that when the Wolpack lined up 10 players to block the punt the Longhorns gunners never left their split positions to move closer to the line to make sure they had enough blockers. Brown didn't reach a BCS bowl game until his 7th season. He was given time in his coaching tenure. He inherited a team that had talent. Strong has not. This is a complete re-build. Anyone who thinks a coach could have come into Austin and immediately turned the team around is delusional and ignores just how far down Brown let the program slip.