I honestly thought Murray was getting called, because it looked like he swung at him.
Just a weird sequence overall.
Cmon, he wasn't trying to hold him up. He grabs him. It was a stupid reaction, and it warranted a penalty.
I saw a very different angle and it was clear Murray initiated the contact first and then Bailey held onto him. So was a penalty warranted? At most something should've been assessed to Murray and make it offsetting. He was out of control when he went out of bounds.
And for a moment, lets let logic take hold for a min. Bailey's not likely to initiate contact on the sidelines as a DB or LB would. Heck, he wasn't even in that gray area where players sometimes stand on the sidelines.
It was a dumb penalty and shouldn't have been called.
I'm still wondering how Escobar didn't score a TD.
YR
I honestly thought Murray was getting called, because it looked like he swung at him.
Just a weird sequence overall.
You and me both? How is that not a TD. I think the NFL out thinks it's self sometimes.
Murray initiates contact awkwardly, like he could have avoided Bailey altogether but instead puts his hand in his chest and pushes him, Bailey holds on, Murray turns around and throws the ball in his chest.
I'm biased, but it should have been on demarco, on both of them, or nothing at all. Bailey taking all the brunt made no sense.
Cmon, he wasn't trying to hold him up. He grabs him. It was a stupid reaction, and it warranted a penalty.
I saw a very different angle and it was clear Murray initiated the contact first and then Bailey held onto him. So was a penalty warranted? At most something should've been assessed to Murray and make it offsetting. He was out of control when he went out of bounds.
And for a moment, lets let logic take hold for a min. Bailey's not likely to initiate contact on the sidelines as a DB or LB would. Heck, he wasn't even in that gray area where players sometimes stand on the sidelines.
It was a dumb penalty and shouldn't have been called.
You are so wrong on this (as usual). Murray pushed him, Bailey grabs him for balance, and Murray throws the ball in his face. A penalty was warranted, but it should have been on Murray.
Pulease. Bailey doesn't grab him for balance. He has a smile on his face. He doesn't look in peril of falling. Either he didn't like what Murray said, or he didn't like Murray putting his hands on him.
Furthermore, Murray putting his hands on Bailey could be interpreted as him trying to stop his momentum. But Bailey has no reason to put his hands on Murray.
It was correctly called a penalty.
Bailey trying to balance himself?
Suuurrreeee!
It looked on the replay like Murray said something to Bailey before turning away, and then Bailey grabbed him. I would have liked to see someone step to Murray after he tossed the ball at him
a non call would of been perfectly acceptable.
Maybe, but you can't have guys on the sideline and not a part of the play getting involved with a player who left the field and was shoved out of bounds. So I can see why they called it as such.
this "involvement" was too minor to call. the only escalation of the situation was Murray, and it was because his pride was hurt.
Pulease. Bailey doesn't grab him for balance. He has a smile on his face. So does the equipment manager, coach or whoever that non-uniformed man was looking on. Bailey doesn't look in peril of falling. Either he didn't like what Murray said, or he didn't like Murray putting his hands on him.
Furthermore, Murray putting his hands on Bailey could be interpreted as him trying to stop his momentum. But Bailey has no reason to put his hands on Murray. And the second man always gets the penalty.
It was correctly called.
Bailey trying to balance himself?
Suuurrreeee he was.