I don’t agree with that at all.
Here’s an exercise; What are the Dallas Cowboys without Dak Prescott?
You lost 6-7 starters, lost Dan Quinn, will probably need to start multiple rookies next year, and then pick up some cheaper FA’s in June/July to fill remaining holes. Then your schedule is a bit harder than last year, as you’re now a first place schedule playing SF again, DET again, The Texans, and the entire AFC North. 3 playoff teams there + Burrow’s return. Take this team as it is, remove Dak Prescott and insert 11 games from Lance and 6 from rush… and what is Dallas? Are you an 8 win team? A 7 win team? 6 wins?
Las Vegas last year was not a bad team, they were a mediocre team. 8-9 despite everything happening. In fact, since they fired their coach that everyone hated, they had a winning record over the final 9 games while starting a rookie QB who’ll probably never start again. In their 9 losses, 5 times did their opponents score 24 of fewer points. Nobody could get the ball to Davante. They had the 7th best scoring defense, better than Dallas, NYJ, Houston, and Pittsburgh. They lost 0-3 to the Vikings, 13-20 to the Dolphins, 23-20 to the Colts, 23-18 to the Steelers. They beat the SB Chiefs in KC. They blew the Chargers out 63-21. Swept the Broncos out of the playoffs.
And then they went out and brought in probably the best defensive addition to any team. Maxx Crosby and Tyree Wilson lining up next to Christian Wilkins is gonna be an insane Dline. That team would be favored if Pitt came to their stadium, Miami did, Cleveland did, new Buffalo did. That’s over half the AFC playoff teams.
Thats a 13-4 team if Dak played for them last year. Would Dak throwing to Davante freaking Adams and Wilkins added to this 8-9 team win 10 games in 2024? Yes. 11 games? Yes. 12 games? A good chance. If the Raiders go 12-5, you would still feel they weren’t a QB away?