SLATEmosphere;3302462 said:
See, this is where I don't get it.
I do not see the difference is drafting Bruce Campbell in the first and trading a first for Gaither.
Just using simple logic, would you rather have a LT that has been proven and seen what the NFL is like or some Rookie that could be a complete bust.
There is absolutely no bust factor on Gaither. The dude is a stud.
Actually there is a bust factor on Gaither. He has work ethic issues and normally players who have those types of issues wind up getting worse when they get a big fat guaranteed signing bonus.
Also if the guy is such as stud, why did they draft someone to take his spot, why are they getting rid of him and why are no other teams stepped up to trade a 1st rounder for him?
Simple logic would dictate that if he is such a stud they would not draft a high round pick to replace him, and I think move UP to draft him which kind of defeats any BPA argument made. Nor would they give him away and again if he was such a stud why has no team already stepped up and took him?
One other thing to consider. If you draft a player or move a player like Free over you don't have to deal with a player coming in that you know will want a fat new contract like gaither will want. I would imagine he would command more than a 27th, or lower, draft pick would get signed for these days.
So...there are circumstances to be considered...it is not so cut and dry that if Jerry does not trade for him that we need to throw a hissy fit or anything.