Ranching
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 46,460
- Reaction score
- 111,932
But it is.That number would be 0 if some certain entity wasnt involved. see exhibit a: prohibition
But it is.That number would be 0 if some certain entity wasnt involved. see exhibit a: prohibition
No blood, no foul right? Are you denying the existence of psychological and emotional trauma? Are you saying that financial hardship caused by the addict's drug use, incarceration, or death is not real damage to people who depend on them?
You state "everyone is responsible for their own safety". Using your logic, should I conclude we should eliminate the police department? Why stop there? How about the military? Coast Guard? How about traffic control devices like stop signs and street lights? What about those who can't defend themselves like the very young, handicapped or elderly? Are they on their own?
There's a difference between between libertarianism and foolishness. I'm not sure you've found it yet.
I agree with everything your posted except the last statement in understanding the opinion of letting them die due to poor decisions made prior. I can say I'm the same way; have 1 gimme 100 but lucky to only play with opiates and not go full fledge. There is something to the schematics of the brain after long term opiate use so you're right it seems like almost a pointless fight. The "addictive gene/personality" doesn't mean we don't still have choices and you're 100% correct. But to let someone die from an od in the "richest" country in the world (not WV; they get the shaft in regards to health services) says more about us as a culture than it does about drug use. Many with that opinion (not you specifically) then turn and in the same sentence complain about gangs n crime, etc. We can't have it both ways, something's gotta give.I picked up " addictive gene" and it triggered my reply, friend.
I don't know if it is considered one and the same as " addictive personality" but I know I've pretty much got that one stamped across my forehead, things I like I'll try them twice or several hundred times,I feel as in all things the term " moderation" is essential in dealing with the compulsive impulses , and a careful study of the whole risk vs.reward aspect (for me) the kick/thrill loses it's initial euphoria/fun and (for me)reading the signposts that read 'dead end' on that road weather it's ramping motocross dirt bikes or dabbling on the dark side of drugs (for me anyway) in time to pump the brakes on the dumbsh*t and stop doing 'those' things,although I've never slammed the horse the people/friends I know who have are on methadone and probably my better friend from that small handful of folks I've known still says to this day " I'd still jump over three gorgeous naked virgin Marys for one slam of China white",,, after hearing him tell me that I've never had the desire to mess with anything like that ,that could obviously re-route a man's basic hard wiring schematics.
I've been 'another friend of Bill' ,a 12 stepper,and chip flipper in the past,also.
In summary I guess the gist of my blathering boils down to the phrase " priorities in life" as I can understand the one dudes view in the O.P.'s news article where he said just leave them lay where they were.
I do acknowledge those medical stories are true as well but the pill factories are the main culprit (FLA Docs flooding the market; funneled mainly to WV/KY in 2000s; the hillbilly heroin BP mentioned and now spread across the country). In my experience, most are taking pills fully knowing the reason initially and it's solely for the high instead of the medical doctor story I hear a lot in the news.
Sure you can. Both lead to self-destruction.
This is not accurate.
Its easy to find the statistics for this stuff too:
Compare:
Opioid use disorders resulted in 51,000 worldwide deaths in 2013 up from 18,000 deaths in 1990.
vs.
- In 2012, 3.3 million deaths, or 5.9 percent of all global deaths (7.6 percent for men and 4.0 percent for women), were attributable to alcohol consumption
51,000 or 3,300,000? Seems pretty clear.
100% true if you take what you said at exact face value without any further assumptions.
You said prescription/opioid drug abuse vs just plain old alcohol (no abuse mentioned).
Take out the addiction part and it makes it not even a comparison.
People that are disagreeing with you are adding to your comment something you did not say.
I know,man.GD Coach!
Good stuff,friend!I agree with everything your posted except the last statement in understanding the opinion of letting them die due to poor decisions made prior. I can say I'm the same way; have 1 gimme 100 but lucky to only play with opiates and not go full fledge. There is something to the schematics of the brain after long term opiate use so you're right it seems like almost a pointless fight. The "addictive gene/personality" doesn't mean we don't still have choices and you're 100% correct. But to let someone die from an od in the "richest" country in the world (not WV; they get the shaft in regards to health services) says more about us as a culture than it does about drug use. Many with that opinion (not you specifically) then turn and in the same sentence complain about gangs n crime, etc. We can't have it both ways, something's gotta give.
I see what you meant moreso now re-reading it. I even admitted to the "pointless fight" myself so was agreeing with you wo catching on tbh. The banging your head against the wall feeling from someone who works in the element like the DEA agent example would surely jade their perspective over time even if going into the profession with "extra" compassion towards the users initially. Feel ya.Good stuff,friend!
I'm glad you took the time of reading my ' germ' post in what could be perceived as a 'sterile' or blameless forum setting being projected by other forum members, and I'll attempt to clarify for my closing statement, I said I could understand Mr.zero empathy, Compassion or sympathy guy's view ( pretty sure a veteran D.E.A. agent would hold a similar one )
And that Mr.zero's " priorities in life" had been firmly established,,,,, I myself wouldn't want to see them or anybody else die.
Sure. So can chocolate and fatty foods and a whole host of other things. I'm not minimizing alcohol or it's dangers when not responsibly consumed. But the opioid issue has reached epidemic proportions and alcohol is not anywhere near the same threat level.
Especially Shiner Bock. LolThat's ridiculous. Alcohol destroys the lives of many many more people than opioids.
Especially Shiner Bock. Lol
But it tastes so goooood!
Especially Shiner Bock. Lol
These are societal and cultural problems and not just "drug problems"
This is a much larger issue
Where does this right come from? I know of no rights, in this Country, that support that but it is possible that you know something I do not.
Agreed.
We've never had so much "stuff". Even those living below the poverty live a much better life and have access to much more than those living in poverty just 50 years ago.
And even though we have all this "stuff" we're unhappy and unfulfilled which leads to boredom, self esteem issues and looking for anything that can make us feel better about ourselves (like drugs).