Gangsta Spanksta
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,795
- Reaction score
- 10,171
Yup Rich and went Hollywood with all those sleep number commercials.Dak is rich lol. Just build another one lol.
Yup Rich and went Hollywood with all those sleep number commercials.Dak is rich lol. Just build another one lol.
Russell Wilson recently traded to Denver for two #1's and two #2's and some players.Everyone keeps saying "trade him to Atlanta"
Ok...well ATL does need a QB.
Any sane person who has any football knowledge at all knows ATL isnt trading their Top 10 pick for Dak (#8 i THINK)....so what is it people are suggesting we get in return from ATL?
The trade team actually makes sense....but what compensation would make sense for both teams? (Knowing that their top choice would be the Chicago QB...who I believe still has abyear or 2 left on his cheap rookie deal), and per the rumor mill could be had for a 2nd.
The Denver Broncos very much regret making that deal. What NFL general manager, knowing how badly that deal worked out for Denver, would consider any deal remotely similar to it for Dak Prescott? No team is trading anything for Dak because every team knows that if Dallas wants to move on from him they need only wait for him to become a free agent. If they are still interested they can out bid any other team that’s interested and get him for absolutely zero compensation to Dallas. If you were the GM of any of the other 31 teams in the NFL would you trade “two #1’s and two#2’s and some players” for Dak Prescott? Would you?Russell Wilson recently traded to Denver for two #1's and two #2's and some players.
Your opinion on QB trades are almost as bad as your opinions on officiating
And you think teams are looking at that Russell Wilson trade...with how it worked out, and are going "Hey, let's do what Denver did!" LOLRussell Wilson recently traded to Denver for two #1's and two #2's and some players.
Your opinion on QB trades are almost as bad as your opinions on officiating
I know it makes sense for US.Our cap savings would help extend a window.
Paying Dak, Lamb, and Parsons is just more of the same.
You know you cant build a strong enough roster to win anything with.
Dak had a heck of a season and his ability increased as a player but paying him is a dead end.
Anyone with any football sense knows that.
Getting rid of him opens a ton of possibilities.
I wouldn't be opposed depending on the draft capital. Use one of the picks to add a QB to compete with Lance. Might take a giant step backward, but we need to be bold to try to get over the hump. I don't blame Dak for not getting us over the hump, but we need to just keep searching for answers instead of sticking with the status quo. And that's not just at the QB position.A post June 1st trade would save 34
Lance has nothing.It saves money against the cap in 2025 as well. The only year it increases his cap hit is 2026, where it adds 11m. If people want him gone so badly, it can be done....especially if you draft his replacement or just go with Lance and see what he has, If Lance completely sucks, we have a terrible record and get a shot at a franchise type QB.
It is really not that hard to figure it out. McCarthy is back, which means Dak will be back.A post June 1st trade would save 34
We will not even attempt to trade Dak.The only team dumb enough to take Dak in a trade would be the 'ol No Names.
The only person, not team, to give up a 4th for Trey Lance, is Jeruh.The only team dumb enough to take Dak in a trade would be the 'ol No Names.
No, it would not. The June 1st thing only applies to releases, not trades. This info isn't hard to find.A post June 1st trade would save 34
Anyway we can Lance and save some money?No, it would not. The June 1st thing only applies to releases, not trades. This info isn't hard to find.
This entire thread is nonsense based on a false premise. Well done, braveheart.
The 34M savings applies to a POST 6/1 cut or trade. For a trade, Dak would have to agree, he has a no trade clause.No, it would not. The June 1st thing only applies to releases, not trades. This info isn't hard to find.
This entire thread is nonsense based on a false premise. Well done, braveheart.
What about Deshaun Watson? Mind you he got traded for when everyone knew he had a suspension coming….The Denver Broncos very much regret making that deal. What NFL general manager, knowing how badly that deal worked out for Denver, would consider any deal remotely similar to it for Dak Prescott? No team is trading anything for Dak because every team knows that if Dallas wants to move on from him they need only wait for him to become a free agent. If they are still interested they can out bid any other team that’s interested and get him for absolutely zero compensation to Dallas. If you were the GM of any of the other 31 teams in the NFL would you trade “two #1’s and two#2’s and some players” for Dak Prescott? Would you?
Of course we won't. He's a Cowboy for life.We will not even attempt to trade Dak.
That's exactly the point.How about we keep it simple and do a June first cut!!! Have to find a team that is willing to do a trade
Wrong.The June 1st thing only applies to releases, not trades. This info isn't hard to find.
No reason to argue about it. He is not going anywhere and will be extended.The 34M savings applies to a POST 6/1 cut or trade. For a trade, Dak would have to agree, he has a no trade clause.
https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/dallas-cowboys