Rockport
AmberBeer
- Messages
- 42,869
- Reaction score
- 42,466
I don’t recall ever seeing anyone say that. But I wouldn’t be surprised.Absolutely, but there are those here who believe that Dak is better than Troy. Believe it or not
I don’t recall ever seeing anyone say that. But I wouldn’t be surprised.Absolutely, but there are those here who believe that Dak is better than Troy. Believe it or not
He was Rookie of the Year and set numerous NFL and Cowboys records with that inheritance. Short memory I guess. Too much shalicqour?Oh how right you are Lamar.
Master Prescott inherited the best offensive line in football and the #1 pick at Running back and could still only manage pedestrian numbers. Dude Is mediocrity personified
2nd best. Tom was by far the better coach.aikman was coached by arguably the best coach the cowboys ever had. (sorry, tom). he had the greatest oc ever in norv turner. he had, consistently, the best o-line in the game. dak has been handicapped by garrett, linehan and a talented o-line group that's been getting injured quite a lot lately. never underestimate the value of great coaching.
Not really, just a sports forum with some pretty strong opinions. If you find it toxic and awful, why remain here and post? And by the Likes you received, you are not alone in that assessment.This board is simply toxic. What an awful place.
You guys love comparing Dak to HoFers and pounding your chest when he comes up just short
No, nearly every expert analyst out there speaks for him. No matter how many times you call people haters, it doesn't change the fact that our defense is more responsible for a winning record than Dak is.
I want Dak to be great. I want him to be the greatest QB in the history of the NFL, as long as he's the starting QB of the Dallas Cowboys....and if he ever approaches elite status, I'll be right there rooting him on. Hell, I'm rooting for him now. I'm also rooting for my one legged nephew to break records in track and field.
No he did not have the accuracy. That was stated in his a football life special. I believe it was him or Parcells that said he had to work at it daily. Either way that was another point people brought up when Troy made comments about having it or not in the past. It was something that just couldn't be taught or learned. It was thrown around that Romo had it yet when he says himself he had to learn it it was crickets.Romo sat, because he was an UDFA from division III. He had the arm, the accuracy but lacked understanding of the game. he learned to control his gun slinger mentality. with that said, he had good offensive cast and he produced. defenses lacked often. this year, our defense is phenomenal compared to past 8 years. we can attribute multiple victories directly to the defense when offense struggled. Tampa, Saints, Philly come to mind recently. in contrast, when offense lacks to be average, we tend to lose. all this defense needs is an average offense and we have failed in that recently.
You would be correct. Romo stated that he could see the play that needed to be made but would throw the ball at the feet of the receiver. He said his guilty pleasure was learning how to throw the ball from different angles. He didn't worry about winning or losing, just improving on throwing the ball.No he did not have the accuracy. That was stated in his a football life special. I believe it was him or Parcells that said he had to work at it daily. Either way that was another point people brought up when Troy made comments about having it or not in the past. It was something that just couldn't be taught or learned. It was thrown around that Romo had it yet when he says himself he had to learn it it was crickets.
You would be correct. Romo stated that he could see the play that needed to be made but would throw the ball at the feet of the receiver. He said his guilty pleasure was learning how to throw the ball from different angles. He didn't worry about winning or losing, just improving on throwing the ball.
You could even see how important this was for Romo when it showed the clip of him and Aaron Rogers at the pro bowl. He asked Aaron if he ever changes his grip and Aaron was showing Romo how to hold the ball and put his hips into the throw for zip.
No he did not have the accuracy. That was stated in his a football life special. I believe it was him or Parcells that said he had to work at it daily. Either way that was another point people brought up when Troy made comments about having it or not in the past. It was something that just couldn't be taught or learned. It was thrown around that Romo had it yet when he says himself he had to learn it it was crickets.
I see, so Dak misses wide open receivers so often because the offense got more conservative....I get it now, thank you!You apparently don't understand situational coaching.
When the defense keeps you in it, the coaches/playcallers will tighten up and play more conservative...
The defense is good. You're not stating anything anyone else doesn't already know..
The key, to some of us here, is context. And there really is a lot to be excited about with Dak.
You have to consider how he played as a rookie and the fact he's a young player.
Cowboy fans have a habit of being biased about players of old. But that's actually what maks Dak so special, he came in way ahead of the curve in some aspects of his game in his rookie year.
His story is similar to Romo's when he unseated Bledsoe in that regard.
You guys forget, all of our quarterbacks, including Aikman had flaws.
They weren't gods.
Selective memory is rampant among Cowboys fans....
For every "great" thing they remember, they'll forget two bad plays.
When bad plays are fresh, they dwell on them.
This is why it's important to watch tape in addition to stats.
I see, so Dak misses wide open receivers so often because the offense got more conservative....I get it now, thank you!
You guys love comparing Dak to HoFers and pounding your chest when he comes up just short
So you are really taking stock with that good for Top 10 all time, right?31-16 with 2 Division Titles
95.2 Passer Rating .....good for Top 10 All Time
66.2% Comp Rating.......63-25 TD-INT
Another 900 yd Rushing and 18 TDs
Only 25 years old
Never said he hasn't contributed anything. He has made a few plays here and there, extended drives with his legs and led a few comebacks (even though those games should have been blowouts).Dak numbers this year are better than last season, he has thrown fewer ints, he has thrown for more yards, his QB rating is higher. As for defense keeping us in the game? Last time I checked that is what a defense is supposed to do. I think Dak still has much work ahead of him but this daily bashing gets old, you guys act as if he has contribute nothing yet he has hit a lot of big plays this season and some clutch plays to help this team.
We don't know yet do we?So you are really taking stock with that good for Top 10 all time, right?
Who in the top 10 would you consider him better than?
This is the best Aikman ever lookedAren't you the one who made an issue of Aikman's overall No. 1 pick?
Why would I not mention other overall No. 1 picks?
Never said he hasn't contributed anything. He has made a few plays here and there, extended drives with his legs and led a few comebacks (even though those games should have been blowouts).
But if you noticed, this topic is about Aikman. And some Dak supporters, giggle, giggle, actually think that he MAY BE better than, snicker, snicker, Aikman.
Uh, no. CLEARLY a case of when statistics go wrong.
So you can't say now who Dak is better than in the top 10?We don't know yet do we?
He has not yet even begun to peak and when he does it will be glorious