Use TO to his strength's and I promise you this...

Get him the ball in the framework of the offense yes

Force it to him to shut him up no
 
Yeagermeister;2606867 said:
Get him the ball in the framework of the offense yes

Force it to him to shut him up no


Is this the current frame or a modified(some additions) WCO frame?


Because the current frame leaves him in double and triple coverages.
 
YoMick;2606878 said:
Is this the current frame or a modified(some additions) WCO frame?


Because the current frame leaves him in double and triple coverages.

Dallas I doubt will change the entire offense to the WCO because of TO, this is what I'm talking about the offense has shown the ability to move the ball to put up points we don't need to trash the entire offense we need to make better adjustment within it and we need guys to step up and execute in it and when they do we can put up points however you don't change an entire offense for 1 player
 
Doomsday101;2606900 said:
Dallas I doubt will change the entire offense to the WCO because of TO, this is what I'm talking about the offense has shown the ability to move the ball to put up points we don't need to trash the entire offense we need to make better adjustment within it and we need guys to step up and execute in it and when they do we can put up points however you don't change an entire offense for 1 player


You are a funny guy and I like you.
(the old Jedi-inference-mind trick) ;)

Where oh where is it implied to change the WHOLE offense??

We saw plenty of examples of where the ENTIRE offense was shut down MORE THAN ONCE.

3 and out.. 3 and out... 3 and out.... just baffles the mind.
 
"Using TO properly" means "however he decides."

That is my general problem with the premise of this thread. I believe that using him properly means doing whatever it takes to win. That could include phasing him out. It could include waiving him. He would never be okay with either option.

He is a weapon. He is also a distraction to his own team. That is why despite other worldly talent he has never won a Super Bowl and why having him on a roster is no guarantee we will either.

I could care less what he would say to show his gratitude. He could show me his dedication by shutting up. I would appreciate that much more than his gratitude. I believe that would get us closer to winning than catering to him ever will.
 
Hostile;2606964 said:
despite other worldly talent he has never won a Super Bowl
Him not winning a Super Bowl had more to do with McNabb & Reid than Owens. Owens played well enough that day to earn a ring.
 
dcfanatic;2606973 said:
"I can't throw it and catch it"

Yeah, he does.
So he CAN "throw it and catch it"? He's a better talent than I thought. :rolleyes:
 
Magic Routes.

Magic Routes.

Magic Routes.


Magic Routes.


Magic Routes!!!!!!!!!


MAGIC_ROUTES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
 
Ultra Warrior;2606984 said:
So he CAN "throw it and catch it"? He's a better talent than I thought. :rolleyes:
so you're just gonna write off the bad comments huh?
 
Ultra Warrior;2606980 said:
Him not winning a Super Bowl had more to do with McNabb & Reid than Owens. Owens played well enough that day to earn a ring.

Yeah and the rest of the team played well enough in previous playoff games to afford him the opportunity to play in the Super Bowl.

Right?
 
Hostile;2606964 said:
"Using TO properly" means "however he decides."

That is my general problem with this thread. I believe that using him properly means doing whatever it takes to win. That could include phasing him out. It could include waiving him. He would never be okay with either option.

He is a weapon. He is also a distraction to his own team. That is why despite other worldly talent he has never won a Super Bowl and why having him on a roster is no guarantee we will either.

I could care less what he would say to show his gratitude. He could show me his dedication by shutting up. I would appreciate that much more than his gratitude. I believe that would get us closer to winning than catering to him ever will.


Of late, especially... you have problems with Pro TO threads. Thats fine.

That is the best part of your post = its accurate.

For all intents and purposes - he went to Philly and they darn near won the SB in his first year there.Spygate/McNabb = why they lost. The TO acquisition was that close to working.


For me personally... if we cut him and got better and won the SB - I would love and be fine. I dont need TO on this team.

But some posters NEED him to be off the team at any cost.
 
theebs;2606606 said:
T.O. is never going to win a super bowl.

T.O. is never going to play in a super bowl again.

After he is released he is going to have a hard time finding a team to put up with him. All of the west coast offensive coaches who love him are out of the league right now.

but rest assured he isnt winning anything ever.

This man speaks the truth.
 
Rampage;2606844 said:
yeah we won cause of his whopping 2 catches. more like the "they need to throw me the ball more" after he got 20 passes thrown to him.
One of those catches was for a TD. Guess points don't matter in a WIN. :rolleyes:
 
dcfanatic;2606994 said:
Deflect much?

Address it or you are weak sauce.
Address what? That Owens talks on both sides of the fence? Welcome to the NFL.
 
Ultra Warrior;2606997 said:
Address what? That Owens talks on both sides of the fence? Welcome to the NFL.

LOL.

So you tried to call me out and defend him with a direct qoute from him.

Then you just said that all the players talk out of both sides of their mouth.

So then why use the qoute in the first place as your proving point?

Don't answer. We don't care.
 
dcfanatic;2607008 said:
LOL.

So you tried to call me out and defend him with a direct qoute from him.

Then you just said that all the players talk out of both sides of their mouth.

So then why use the qoute in the first place as your proving point?

Don't answer. We don't care.
You point was that he blames EVERYONE but himself, my point was that there have been cases where he HASN'T done this but you just swept that under the rug like it never happened. I answered. You'll respond. You care.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,097
Messages
13,788,596
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top