iceberg
rock music matters
- Messages
- 34,405
- Reaction score
- 7,932
dacowboys;1554514 said:I could care less about dogs and I'm from North America. They are worthless anyway.
wow - id yourself as a troll on post 1.
good job.
dacowboys;1554514 said:I could care less about dogs and I'm from North America. They are worthless anyway.
silverbear;1554494 said:Oh, gonna play that game, are you?? Then chew on this:
That quote is found on the pet-abuse.com website I told you about, taken from an ABC News report on May 31st... that website goes on to say:
That quote is taken from an article in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, dated May 29th... note that the confidential informant making the claim has proven reliable in past investigations... he may even be one of the 4 confidential witnesses cited in the indictment, though I don't know that to be the case...
It's based on these two articles that I made the claim I made about Vick being a VERY big player in this "sport"... this is supported by the long-term interest the Humane Society of the United States has had in Vick as a player in the dogfighting game:
If you can show me where any of the other named codefendants had the wherewithal to bankroll that operation, I'll be happy to back off my claims that Vick was the "ringleader" of that operation... but given that they were living on the property rent-free, that sure suggests that they didn't have that kind of money...
This is documentation of my assertion that Vick was a "person of interest" that the Humane Society had been watching for some years...
So, you accused me of lying, but I can document where I got the assertions I made... if you have any class in you at all, you'll stand up and apologize (though I won't hold my breath waiting, and won't cry myself to sleep when you don't, since I've lost any respect I once had for you)...
But you're not doing any such thing, to the contrary, you're spending a great deal of energy trying to DEFEND the guy...
Oh, bull... saying that dog fighting really isn't that big a deal is defending him, and you know it...
sacase;1554450 said:Have you actually read the indictment? I think not.
He is alleged to have sponsored dogs, not run a whole ring.
silverbear;1554393 said:Nope, instead you're gonna defend him...
See what I mean??
"Only" dog fighting?? I guess you don't know that there's gambling, drugs and illegal guns at virtually every dog fight...
If he gets convicted, he's doing jail time... count on it...
sacase;1554526 said:Sorry, in my opinion, dog fighting is not that big of deal in the grand scheme of things. Is it wrong? Yes. Disgusting? Yes. Of huge importance. No.
Dude you document the media and quote ESPN, like ESPN is never wrong. ESPN is not a credible source. I personally don't know any investigator that would allow his source to appear on a freaking ESPN.
Vick may very well have finaced the dog fighting operation of Bad Newz Kennels. That part is not in contention. Alledging that he was one of the people running the whole ring is what I am saying is just plain false. It is more than clear by the indictment that he is being indicted for his participation in dog fighting not running the whole ring.
iceberg;1554523 said:wow - id yourself as a troll on post 1.
good job.
silverbear;1554528 said:Well, I certainly believe you "think not", because I most assuredly have read the indictment, thanks to the link Cobra provided...
Well, that's a willful distortion of the indictment... he is alleged to have participated in a CONSPIRACY, a conspiracy to "promote, manage, establish, carry on... a business enterprise involving gambling"...
He is further accused of purchasing pit bulls for use in dog fighting competitions, training and breeding pit bulls for use in dog fighting competitions, travelling to other states to participate in dog fighting competitions, providing funding for the expenses connected to the dog fighting operation... testing dogs for their suitability for fighting, and killing those dogs that he found unsuitable...
He is further accused of paying 34 grand to buy the property in Surry County, and developing that property into a dog fighting operation... and when it comes to the financing of this operation, he's the only one of the defendants who had the wherewithal to come up with that kind of money...
All of that is one hell of a lot more than "sponsoring dogs"... so now, you've just distorted the accusations against Vick, in your desperate attempt to defend him...
And you called ME a liar??
sacase;1554461 said:right I am sure the federal government goes right over there to get all of their information.
dacowboys;1554534 said:I don't give a damn what you call me. I still hate dogs.
Then you should become a member of Bad Newz Kennels, you'd fit right in.dacowboys;1554534 said:I don't give a damn what you call me. I still hate dogs.
dacowboys;1554534 said:I don't give a damn what you call me. I still hate dogs.
dacowboys;1554514 said:I could care less about dogs and I'm from North America. They are worthless anyway.
dacowboys;1554534 said:I don't give a damn what you call me. I still hate dogs.
CanadianCowboysFan;1554501 said:Silver, you probably aren't trained in law but the prosecutor will have to have evidence that Vick bankrolled the operation, and cannot convict him simply by saying no one else could have.
iceberg;1554537 said:great - you don't give a damn, i won't give a damn - no one will give a damn. but to call dogs worthless because of your own singular point of view is either ignorance in motion or you're just stirring things up.
either way - got it. tag, you're a troll.
Big Dakota;1554529 said:Most of these guys that defend Vick are criminals themselves.
dacowboys;1554534 said:I don't give a damn what you call me. I still hate dogs.