Wanna-Be Talent Evaluators

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
35,025
Reaction score
20,113
The NFL keeps record of all team and players production by units and every position. Thats not opinions, thats mathematics.
Well the usual argument, stats for Dak are meaningless unless it supports my opinion, then it's the only stat that matters...get it?
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,949
Reaction score
4,044
At this point, Mahomes, Rodgers, Wilson, Allen, it will be Burrows and Herbert soon also. Dak good but not close to elite and Jerry was a fool to pay him as such. At the end of the season please don’t give excuses for Daks failure in games that count he gets paid to deliver not talk about delivering.

Dak is definitely not elite, but a very good quarterback. Rodgers is great but has a losing record against good teams and hasn't shown up big in the playoffs. He has one Superbowl win, but so does Nick Foles and Trent Dilpher.

Mahomes is great as well, but only Brady deserves 200 + million in my opinion.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
35,025
Reaction score
20,113
So you know more about NFL football talent than the people that play, coach, scout and draft in the NFL???? Thats truly amazing!!! I can't doubt you because I don't know you, but much respect to you!!

Which NFL team were you employed by and how long have you been working in the NFL??? Did you start out as a player, got into coaching or are you a league exec??? This is pretty cool!!
Well he did identify Moore as a HOF type QB who everyone missed on and got benched behind Dak because for whatever reason Jerry liked Dak more...no reason given what so ever....I shiet you not, that's what he said.

And also his evaluations were that Tashard Choice was as good or better than Emmitt Smith... Again, I shiet you not.

Whiskey is a wonderful thing. It clarifies so much
 

Brax

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,741
Reaction score
8,981
You're absolutely correct!!! The math shows that 31 other quarterbacks loss too, only one quarterback at a time can win the Superbowl. The other 31 lose.
And how many CCG let alone SBs has Dak even played in? Don’t spin from Dak I’ll look at the stats when I see him produce when it counts. Until then stats mean crap.
 

Brax

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,741
Reaction score
8,981
Dak is definitely not elite, but a very good quarterback. Rodgers is great but has a losing record against good teams and hasn't shown up big in the playoffs. He has one Superbowl win, but so does Nick Foles and Trent Dilpher.

Mahomes is great as well, but only Brady deserves 200 + million in my opinion.
I guess we can agree on Brady and wait till the season is over to continue the debate
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
35,025
Reaction score
20,113
And how many CCG let alone SBs has Dak even played in? Don’t spin from Dak I’ll look at the stats when I see him produce when it counts. Until then stats mean crap.
he has not.....so let me ask, yet again, wins and losses are a QB stat or team stat? the flip flop is quite hard to keep up.

with that said, no one argues except a few who say he is top 5ish and a few who absoutley don't think he even belongs in the league (the extremes you know), but most agree he is top 10ish, good enough to win with, but needs help. second tier. whatever you want to call it. which means we need to have some support around him for the team to be successful. impossible? no, its been done, plenty of times. the big question is can Jerry build such a team? if not, even if we had an Elite QB, which are very hard to find would we still win with Jerry at the helm.
 

stuckindc

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,187
Reaction score
1,322
Because he has generally sacrificed his salary for championships understanding that the key to making perpetual big money after your career is over is to ge the greatest at your sport.
The man will continue to make millions in endorsements, speaking engagements, commentary until his time is up on this earth.
It’s a lot easier when your wife is a billionaire
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
35,025
Reaction score
20,113
At this point, Mahomes, Rodgers, Wilson, Allen, it will be Burrows and Herbert soon also. Dak good but not close to elite and Jerry was a fool to pay him as such. At the end of the season please don’t give excuses for Daks failure in games that count he gets paid to deliver not talk about delivering.
Dak is paid top 9 money. is he top 9-10 or not?
 

PAPPYDOG

There are no Dak haters just Cowboy lovers!!!
Messages
20,671
Reaction score
35,589
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
1 playoff win with good teams in 6 season is self explanatory.
Take out the NFC East wins and he's a .500 QB with 1 playoff win.
Enough already.....if it walks like a Rat, smells like a Rat, looks like a Rat, it's a RAT!!!
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,418
Reaction score
32,808
Yeah you don't get it why what you said is totally illogical, fantasy football made up stuff of legend across decades...

That's the irony and I bet you don't even get that....and then instead of just admitting perhaps you exaggerated a bit you keep digging deeper and sinking further pointing to one person that you think gets it...which is your assumption to begin with....

And I am.more than happy to oblige you and watch u do it.. in fact it's enjoyable for a slow Saturday afternoon.

So keep doing it. Everyone is laughing at you. But it's going right over your head, you don't even get that...

Stealing my material. :laugh:
 

csirl

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,977
Reaction score
4,286
NOONE said Stafford's was a LOSER lmao its simple hes not an upgrade over dak hes a upgrade over Goff..you make this more difficult than it has to be that plain and simple Dak also major upgrade over Goff if you dont think so you are a sad case and lost cause. Stafford, dak ROMO all similar tier qbs , different games but very much in the same tier.

whatever Put Dak on that team they still win SB i mean dak throws far less INTs so less for the defense to bail that team out..yes Stafford was good 17INTS sorry thats not great for starter on that team with those weapons. He played WELL but no different when he was with Detroit just had a SB ready team last season. The comp isnt what Stafford could do here, hes NOT an upgrade over dak..

Dak 38tds 10int they are both on the same level. Same with romo ..that the comp not if Staffords better then dak, its Dak would also have been a major upgrade over GOFF and for sure would have also helped Rams to a SB.. that why you aren't a talent evaluator, you are still missing the fact you think our team is SB ready like the rams and Stafford's an update over dak, NOPE still not true.

The rams were better across the board then us and thats why Stafford rode that wave to a SB..Dak is on that same level period end if story issue is his team has not been in the big moments, show me proof Stafford upgrades our team more than dak, not one single thing he did last year was special. Hes very good qb on great team and he needed weapons like dak does , 14 penalties torpedoed our playoffs game and thats why we lost and Stafford would not have overcome that either.,,17 ints onthat team imagine our OL issues lmao. Stafford play 1st and 20 all game right

give it a rest it was wrong then and wrong now..stafford who got lucky to move to SB ready team i mean Goff got them to a SB thats telling. If its not you are blind. dak, Romo, statffords all same tier qbs in very different situations.

that first line made the rest invalid i mean you believe dak is goff and Stafford would have had the same impact here he had with the rams??..lmao that so not true at all.


In no universe is Dak an upgrade over Stafford. No chance the Rams win the SB with Dak. Cowboys could have won the SB with Stafford (or some of the other elite QBs).
 

stuckindc

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,187
Reaction score
1,322
He hasn't been married to her his whole career has he? :huh:
Besides, Ultra Alpha men don't want to be riding on their wives' coattails.
13 years and if you’re married, what difference does it make. And it’s not like he was making peanuts. You can take a little less to be able to use for other players. When your combined wealth is in the billions. Even for Alphas
 

Haimerej

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,083
Reaction score
6,776
either way it makes no sense i was sayig he got hurt in preseason, if he didn't play that game,
Dak may never have got on the field that year.,.,BTW IMHO you also misread who you were responding too, he meant it was an eventuality Romo would get hurt for large part of the season had it NOT been for the injury in PS..so Daks time while a tad early was going to happen sooner or later and the fact we finished 13-3 dak got ROPOTY and his pay in the playoffs game and zekes as well wasn't why we lost it was defense, so its moot point..romos time was up. Period no way you tank him off the field with an 11-0 run like that.. sort of like last year should have left Steele at RT when collins came back we were on 6-0 run hmm..oops

I understood his point which is why I said what I said. No misreading at all. As regards your point that you shouldn't take out a guy on an 11-0 run, I disagree. Especially when you can upgrade the position.
 

nalam

The realist
Messages
11,986
Reaction score
7,212
Perfect example of you being a contrarian. I respond to someone saying Romo would've just been injured again if they let him play and you bring up preseason. We weren't talking about preseason. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.

His honor Blue has this habit of butting into posts responded to someone else and trash the poster for no reason , as if he is the vast ocean of knowledge of football. LOL
 
Top