Calm down and think for a minute.
All I've said is that with Romo, we can overcome a mediocre or even poor day by the defense. Not EVERY game, but often. We won a 41-37 game and a 31-22 game this season, games of 45-35, 28-23, 28-27 and 37-27 last year, and a 37-27 game after he took over in 2006. Without Romo, we haven't scored more than 14 points in any game, and our opponents have scored more than 10 points per game on drives that started inside our territory.
So ... to summarize ... with Romo, we typically score a lot more points than we have without Romo -- this year, it's 29.2 points per game when Romo plays, compared to 13.7 when he doesn't. And when our offense moves the ball and doesn't give the opponent the ball deep in our territory, the opponent has a much more difficult time scoring. Combine the two, and our chances of winning go up greatly.
Seriously, even the biggest hater in the world has to recognize those simple facts.