phildadon86
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,815
- Reaction score
- 32,721
Well then.I disagree.
A stat showing what this team needs to do to win is not meaningless, to me. The 90's team had a similar stat. Every time Emmitt had 20 carries the winning percentage jumped up to like 96%. And guess what... every time Dallas won a Super Bowl in the 90's Emmitt had over 340 carries that year. 340 divided by 16 equals 21 carries a game. So, the stat of needed 100 yards on the ground, for this team to win, shows us we need the focus on running the ball.
Does that mean that Aikman "needed" 100 yards to win a game? Or that running for 100 yards is the winning ticket to winning ball games?