Eskimo
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,821
- Reaction score
- 496
Chocolate Lab;2073075 said:Well... No question about that.
To tell you the truth, I'm not even 100% sold on Romo, as heretical as it is to say. But if he's not good to great, then we aren't winning a Super Bowl anyway.
As far as Matt Jones goes... I'd definitely take him. No, he hasn't been very good, but I'd take a chance on that kind of athletic ability.
Don't know what summer was talking about re: Jones at QB. He was an excellent college QB. But there's not much to study when you run that read option offense.
I agree with Romo not being in the elite league - where Manning and Brady are. He seems to make too many mistakes and is a little too inconsistent. It remains to be seen what he would accomplish with an average set of receiving options as the deck has been stacked in his favour in his frist two seasons here.
The trouble is that it took so long to groom him that he barely had any starts under his belt before a sniff of FA was available. We decided to bite the bullet on a $11M/yr contract. Were we wrong to do that versus franchising him for 1 more year look? I don't know. We definitely bought at the peak of his second year starting. I doubt it would have been much cheaper if we waited for the offseason.