dragon_mikal
Fire Garrett
- Messages
- 10,452
- Reaction score
- 7,135
I'd be happy as any Cowboys fan would be.
Romo didn't get that contract to be a back up . If Romo can play, he starts.I respect your statement it's a honor thing.
The news leaves me in the shock point now
and i dont know the smart move honestly.
But I'm convinced Dak is the future.
I dont want to get into another [evidence] pissing contest
its just my feelings at the late breaking news
He won't. My gosh you guys are insufferable. Really need to tap the brakes. 4-4 at best IMO but I'd love to be wrong. Real defenses in real games will be an eye opener for all the delusional fans out there. Pre season for God sakes...
Romo didn't get that contract to be a back up . If Romo can play, he starts.
If Dak starts the season 6-2 and is playing well he remains the starter. Rimo has not played much so the last thing we need is to rush him back and see a Carolina Panthers disaster. It's that simple.. Dak plays well he stays it's just that simple.
Tony is not coming back, too risky, he has a family to think about and has plenty of money.
Quarterback Rating, I am a Queen Beats Rook guyWhat's a QBR guy?
In simple language, our rook is gonna need a pass defense. The top 10 defenses according to that stat averaged 11 wins last year, no matter who their QB was.Quarterback Rating, I am a Queen Beats Rook guy
Players know they are promised nothing. Romo is aware that he costs 14m a season and Dak is <1m. Do you remember Montana and Young? Happens even to FBHOF superbowl winning QBs. Manning and Luck?The idea is goofy of not putting Romo back in.
So if Witten got hurt and Swaim played well do we keep Witten on the bench effectively putting him out to pasture?
All the players appreciate the teams loyalty and understand that an injury doesn't cost a superstar their job. Especially the face of the franchise.
Players know they are promised nothing. Romo is aware that he costs 14m a season and Dak is <1m. Do you remember Montana and Young? Happens even to FBHOF superbowl winning QBs. Manning and Luck?
That;s why QBR means little to me, what was Manning's in 2015, Johnson's in 2003, Dilfer's in 2000 and McMahon's in 85? It is all about one thing, TEAM and we do not have it yet. Roger and Troy were great because they had great D's.In simple language, our rook is gonna need a pass defense. The top 10 defenses according to that stat averaged 11 wins last year, no matter who their QB was.
The most expensive backup
I would be more inclined to agree if our d didn't suck so badlyI just don't see why he can't do that well or better. This season should be about our running game regardless who our QB is. Timely throws to Dez and lets get rolling. I just hope we design the offense around Dak now, more zone read etc. he has wheels let's use them!!
This is the only logical answer.
Only a fool would pull a QB who's playing well and has a 6-2 record.
There are two QB's in every game, Señor Sofá.That;s why QBR means little to me, what was Manning's in 2015, Johnson's in 2003, Dilfer's in 2000 and McMahon's in 85?
Then he will have done his job & set Romo up for a nice deep playoff run.If we want to be in playoff contention and possibly beyond, don't let Romo back in (pun intended).
The minute that Tony is cleared by doctor's to play again, he is going to be in again.