cowboynut
Active Member
- Messages
- 134
- Reaction score
- 150
I bet Hampster hunter tee shirts would sell.
Lol we should make them.
I bet Hampster hunter tee shirts would sell.
This x 1000The blue jerseys make for the best uniforms in sports.
While I loved Romo when he actually played, his fans have turned me into a hater afterwards. He’s the most propped up loser in the history of sports.
Zeke, even when healthy, is no longer a special running back in terms of being a playmaker with the ball in his hands.
He’s a short yardage specialist and a good pass blocking RB.
QB play wasn’t the reason we lost the game to GB in the playoffs though. I don’t think Romo overcomes the refs, the play calling, or could defend Jared Cook.I saw this somewhere and thought it would be fun to hear others opinions.
It can be anything, historical or current. I'll start:
I think Tony Romo might be the most talented Cowboys QB ever, but he was ruined by bad defenses, Jason Garrett, and injuries. I also believe that if we went back to him in 2016 we would've had a much better shot reaching the Super Bowl. I supported sticking with Dak at the time, because I was over Romo always missing time, but Romo was probably the best option that year looking back. It would have also gave Dak a great veteran QB to learn behind.
Maybe, but I believe it doesn't take until the 4th quarter for Romo to get it going.QB play wasn’t the reason we lost the game to GB in the playoffs though. I don’t think Romo overcomes the refs, the play calling, or could defend Jared Cook.
There’s been very few RBs that remain special. It’s hard to beat young legs. That’s why people like Dickerson, Walter Payton, Emmitt , AP and others are so respected
I’m not surprised by any Running Backs decline.....I was just surprised and disappointed that Jerry agreed to that contract.....I though the Cowboys were getting away from that.
I think Emmitt Smith was a better overall player than Barry Sanders.
Moose was not one dimensional..he help loosen up defenses with his pass catching..special teams etc...many times he would keep drives going with his catches out in the flat..especially in the beginning of games when teams were stacked to stop Emmit and Double Michael
..Moose would provide another weapon that defenses had to account for..far from one dimensional..he
I couldn't have said that any better.I have the opposite reaction with other fan bases. Most say that Romo always concerned them because they knew what he was capable of. Most were \ are lukewarm on Dak. Most didn't think he should have been re-signed. At least not at a price that prevented you from looking for someone else.
I think the media plays such a large role in forming 90% of the population's opinions. Only 10% (I'm just spit balling) truly understand what makes plays fail or succeed. I can't tell you how many times the average fan starts telling me how bad a player was & its straight from the game summary on TV. They have no context that yes the QB did throw an interception that sealed the game but they have no clue that there were three errors by their teammates that put them in 4th & 19 to begin with and that the QB made an unbelievable play to get the ball on the hands of the receiver which would have converted if he had caught it cleanly but instead it deflected & was intercepted. All the media cycle wants is a simple story with a hero or a zero and that's what becomes the "truth" among the masses. The truth is that there are generally a number of mistakes throughout the course of the game that determine the fate of a team. On a particular play you may be able to place the glory or blame on one person ... but even individual plays are often more complex than that.
2014 & 2016Tony Romo's ONLY chance to Win or Loss a Superbowl was with Bill Parcells.