birdwells1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,839
- Reaction score
- 4,075
BraveHeartFan;5076909 said:I love Irvin. Love his fire. Love his passion. But some people way over blow that to the point that they make it seem like him wanting to win simply made the team win.
They devalue the contribution and needs of Aikman, Smith, that defense, that O-line.
I mean do you think Irvin only had that passion after they started winning? Was he never demanding 110% effort in 88 and 89 and 90 when the Cowboys weren't winners necassarily? Or did that only start to happen from 91 on?
You take away Aikman and his demands of perfection, Emmitt and his drive to be the greatest of all time, Jimmy's desire to field a perfect unit...take away any one of those factors and guess what happens? Irvin is a really passionate, fiery, wonderful player who never wins a ring.
I have no problem with anyone having Irvin as their favorite player because of his passion and desire to win and the leadership that he showed but I'm not buying that the team was as great as it was based heavily on that factor alone.
Him wanting to win didn't just affect him he demanded that of his teammates
also, just listen to Nate talk about Irvin challenged him during games.
How can Irvin, as a rookie in 89, come to Dallas and be "Michael Irvin" with all those vets around? It took awhile for him to earn the respect of his teammates through blood and sweat.
You do remember that when Jimmy got there Irvin had a "list" of players that were just there to pick up a paycheck. Again people devalue the impact of a dynamic leader, if this team had a player with one-third the leadershipof Irvin we probably make the playoffs the last 2 years.